← All teams

Western Conference · 2026-27

Los Angeles Clippers LAC

2–7
2026-27 record
1477
Elo rating
with the forecast of Nov 8
107.6
Offensive rating
last 10 games
114.3
Defensive rating
last 10, lower is better
99.8
Pace
possessions per game
242 of 355 forecasts for LAC games picked the winner.

Hover the ball to see a season.

Every graded LAC game, one dot each, oldest at the center. 242 of 355 forecasts picked the winner (colored dots).

Elo rating, recent games

LAC pregame Elo over its last 82 games with a forecast, from 1542 to 1477 14001450150015501600 new season 1477 Nov 2025 Nov 2026
Pregame Elo stored with each of LAC's last 82 forecasts. Dashed: 1500, the long-run average.

Upcoming

Schedule
Nov 10 9:00 PM ET
LAC Los Angeles Clippers 2–7 –
@PHX Phoenix Suns (home) 3–5 –
Forecast coming Details
Nov 13 10:30 PM ET
OKC Oklahoma City Thunder 8–2 –
@LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) 2–7 –
Forecast coming Details

Recent results

Archive
Nov 8 Final
NOP New Orleans Pelicans 115 123
@LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) 119 139
NOP 39% 61% LAC

Why: Elo 1.7 → LAC · Pace 1.2 → LAC

✓ Picked LAC Details
Nov 4 Final
MIA Miami Heat 120 117
@LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) 116 116
MIA 58% 42% LAC
✓ Picked MIA Details
Nov 2 Final
TOR Toronto Raptors 116 125
@LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) 113 118
TOR 59% 41% LAC

Why: Elo 1.9 → TOR · Season margin 1.1 → TOR

✓ Picked TOR Details
Nov 1 Final
LAC Los Angeles Clippers 113 112
@GSW Golden State Warriors (home) 112 124
LAC 53% 47% GSW

Coin flip Why: Injuries 2.1 → LAC · Defense, last 10 1.7 → LAC

✗ Picked LAC Details
Oct 30 Final
LAC Los Angeles Clippers 113 101
@MIN Minnesota Timberwolves (home) 115 127
LAC 44% 56% MIN

Why: Injuries 2.2 → LAC · Elo 1.8 → MIN

✓ Picked MIN Details

Predictability

How closely the forecasts tracked LAC games. A team can be hard for this model to forecast whether it is good or bad: misses come from the model's limits, roster changes, missing information and ordinary game-to-game variation. Compare all 30 teams

2026-27 (in progress)

Small sample: 9 games. These figures are a running log, not a measurement, and no ranking is shown.

11.3 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 7.3 to 15.6
−3.6
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -10.6 to 3.7
14.0 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.7
78%
winner picked
9 games involving LAC
2 / 4.4
actual / expected wins
gap −2.4
0.190
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 024 2 actual 4.4 exp. 159 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -30-150+15+30 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 9 margin errors; mean -3.6 points 012 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 0 games -24 to -20 pts: 1 games -20 to -16 pts: 1 games -16 to -12 pts: 1 games -12 to -8 pts: 0 games -8 to -4 pts: 1 games -4 to 0 pts: 1 games 0 to 4 pts: 2 games 4 to 8 pts: 0 games 8 to 12 pts: 0 games 12 to 16 pts: 1 games 16 to 20 pts: 1 games 20 to 24 pts: 0 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -3.6 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2026-27, smallest to largest; LAC is 10 of 30 3579111315171921232527 median 11.7 UTA: 6.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.4–9.2 UTA 6.7 n=10 NOP: 7.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.3–11.7 NOP 7.7 n=10 CLE: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 4.8–12.8 CLE 8.5 n=10 SAS: 8.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.6–10.4 SAS 8.5 n=10 PHI: 8.82 points over 11 games, 90% interval 5.73–12.36 PHI 8.8 n=11 MIL: 9.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 5.1–13.4 MIL 9.0 n=10 LAL: 9.64 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.27–13 LAL 9.6 n=11 PHX: 9.88 points over 8 games, 90% interval 4.12–18.25 PHX 9.9 n=8 IND: 10.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.8–14 IND 10.2 n=10 LAC: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.33–15.56 LAC 11.3 n=9 NYK: 11.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 7.89–14.67 NYK 11.3 n=9 SAC: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.9–16.2 SAC 11.5 n=10 WAS: 11.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 6.7–16.6 WAS 11.5 n=10 DET: 11.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.56–15.56 DET 11.6 n=9 BOS: 11.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.4–16.7 BOS 11.7 n=10 DEN: 11.75 points over 8 games, 90% interval 6.88–16.88 DEN 11.8 n=8 BKN: 11.90 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.6–16.7 BKN 11.9 n=10 CHI: 12.00 points over 9 games, 90% interval 6.44–18.11 CHI 12.0 n=9 MIA: 12.00 points over 10 games, 90% interval 7.8–16 MIA 12.0 n=10 GSW: 12.50 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.4–17.4 GSW 12.5 n=10 MIN: 12.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 7.36–18.18 MIN 12.6 n=11 HOU: 13.10 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.9–17.9 HOU 13.1 n=10 ATL: 13.55 points over 11 games, 90% interval 6.64–21.55 ATL 13.6 n=11 ORL: 13.67 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.67–18.22 ORL 13.7 n=9 OKC: 14.20 points over 10 games, 90% interval 8.3–20.5 OKC 14.2 n=10 DAL: 14.70 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.7–19.8 DAL 14.7 n=10 POR: 15.11 points over 9 games, 90% interval 8.89–22 POR 15.1 n=9 TOR: 15.33 points over 9 games, 90% interval 9.78–21.33 TOR 15.3 n=9 MEM: 15.56 points over 9 games, 90% interval 10.22–20.78 MEM 15.6 n=9 CHA: 17.30 points over 10 games, 90% interval 9.3–26.3 CHA 17.3 n=10 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 9 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 vs NOP 61% 119–115 W 139–123 ✓correct +12
Nov 4 vs MIA 42% 116–120 L 116–117 ✓correct +3
Nov 2 vs TOR 41% 113–116 L 118–125 ✓correct −4
Nov 1 at GSW 53% 113–112 L 112–124 ✗missed −13
Oct 30 at MIN 44% 113–115 L 101–127 ✓correct −24
Oct 28 vs LAL 62% 115–111 L 87–103 ✗missed −20
Oct 25 at OKC 26% 108–117 L 101–108 ✓correct +2
Oct 23 at LAL 44% 111–113 L 117–125 ✓correct −6
Oct 21 vs SAC 69% 118–111 W 121–96 ✓correct +18

2025-26

11.5 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.9 to 13.1; 16th smallest of 30
+0.2
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.4 to 2.8
14.5 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.4
71%
winner picked
82 games involving LAC
42 / 42.9
actual / expected wins
gap −0.8
0.201
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 010203040 42 actual 42.9 exp. 14182 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 82 margin errors; mean +0.2 points 0612 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 2 games -28 to -24 pts: 3 games -24 to -20 pts: 1 games -20 to -16 pts: 5 games -16 to -12 pts: 5 games -12 to -8 pts: 6 games -8 to -4 pts: 7 games -4 to 0 pts: 12 games 0 to 4 pts: 10 games 4 to 8 pts: 8 games 8 to 12 pts: 5 games 12 to 16 pts: 5 games 16 to 20 pts: 2 games 20 to 24 pts: 6 games 24 to 28 pts: 3 games 28 to 32 pts: 2 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean +0.2 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2025-26, smallest to largest; LAC is 16 of 30 79111315 median 11.5 NOP: 9.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.84 NOP 9.6 n=82 DAL: 9.67 points over 81 games, 90% interval 8.4–11.09 DAL 9.7 n=81 DET: 10.16 points over 95 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.82 DET 10.2 n=95 IND: 10.32 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.74–12.01 IND 10.3 n=82 SAS: 10.41 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.12–11.82 SAS 10.4 n=103 GSW: 10.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.06–11.98 GSW 10.4 n=82 CLE: 10.56 points over 100 games, 90% interval 9.19–11.94 CLE 10.6 n=100 POR: 10.59 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.22–12.23 POR 10.6 n=87 DEN: 10.67 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.09–12.41 DEN 10.7 n=88 MEM: 10.72 points over 80 games, 90% interval 9.05–12.4 MEM 10.7 n=80 ORL: 10.76 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.19–12.45 ORL 10.8 n=86 PHX: 10.87 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.27–12.48 PHX 10.9 n=86 HOU: 10.93 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.23 HOU 10.9 n=88 LAL: 11.25 points over 92 games, 90% interval 9.9–12.52 LAL 11.3 n=92 OKC: 11.48 points over 96 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.17 OKC 11.5 n=96 LAC: 11.50 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.93–13.07 LAC 11.5 n=82 CHI: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.22 CHI 11.6 n=82 SAC: 11.59 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.29 SAC 11.6 n=82 PHI: 11.63 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.02–13.37 PHI 11.6 n=93 BOS: 11.89 points over 89 games, 90% interval 10.47–13.35 BOS 11.9 n=89 WAS: 12.07 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.65–13.57 WAS 12.1 n=82 UTA: 12.18 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–14.11 UTA 12.2 n=82 BKN: 12.48 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.94–14.34 BKN 12.5 n=82 MIN: 12.49 points over 94 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.07 MIN 12.5 n=94 ATL: 12.58 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.92–14.49 ATL 12.6 n=88 TOR: 12.62 points over 89 games, 90% interval 11.03–14.24 TOR 12.6 n=89 MIA: 12.63 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.02–14.3 MIA 12.6 n=82 MIL: 12.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.06–14.59 MIL 12.8 n=82 CHA: 13.29 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.57–15.17 CHA 13.3 n=82 NYK: 13.45 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.64–15.37 NYK 13.4 n=99 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 82 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 12 vs GSW 71% 117–109 W 115–110 ✓correct −3
Apr 10 at POR 47% 112–113 L 97–116 ✓correct −18
Apr 8 vs OKC 44% 110–112 L 110–128 ✓correct −16
Apr 7 vs DAL 83% 127–113 W 116–103 ✓correct −1
Apr 5 at SAC 74% 119–110 W 138–109 ✓correct +20
Apr 2 vs SAS 47% 112–113 L 99–118 ✓correct −18
Mar 31 vs POR 61% 116–112 L 104–114 ✗missed −14
Mar 29 at MIL 81% 120–107 W 127–113 ✓correct +1
Mar 27 at IND 71% 122–114 W 114–113 ✓correct −7
Mar 25 vs TOR 56% 118–116 W 119–94 ✓correct +23
Mar 23 vs MIL 76% 121–111 W 129–96 ✓correct +23
Mar 21 at DAL 66% 122–116 W 138–131 ✓correct +1
Mar 19 at NOP 53% 118–117 L 99–105 ✗missed −7
Mar 18 at NOP 56% 120–118 L 109–124 ✗missed −17
Mar 16 vs SAS 36% 111–116 L 115–119 ✓correct +1
Mar 14 vs SAC 86% 125–109 L 109–118 ✗missed −25
Mar 13 vs CHI 80% 124–112 W 119–108 ✓correct −1
Mar 11 vs MIN 56% 116–114 W 153–128 ✓correct +23
Mar 9 vs NYK 47% 110–111 W 126–118 ✗missed +9
Mar 7 at MEM 58% 117–114 W 123–120 ✓correct ±0
Mar 6 at SAS 26% 110–119 L 112–116 ✓correct +5
Mar 4 vs IND 83% 121–107 W 130–107 ✓correct +9
Mar 2 at GSW 47% 112–113 W 114–101 ✗missed +14
Mar 1 vs NOP 61% 116–112 W 137–117 ✓correct +16
Feb 26 vs MIN 44% 113–115 L 88–94 ✓correct −4
Feb 22 vs ORL 53% 114–113 L 109–111 ✗missed −3
Feb 20 at LAL 47% 113–114 L 122–125 ✓correct −2
Feb 19 vs DEN 53% 111–110 W 115–114 ✓correct ±0
Feb 11 at HOU 47% 108–109 W 105–102 ✗missed +4
Feb 10 at HOU 39% 108–112 L 95–102 ✓correct −3
Feb 8 at MIN 34% 113–119 W 115–96 ✗missed +25
Feb 6 at SAC 64% 115–110 W 114–111 ✓correct −2
Feb 4 vs CLE 44% 112–114 L 91–124 ✓correct −31
Feb 2 vs PHI 59% 115–112 L 113–128 ✗missed −18
Feb 1 at PHX 44% 109–111 W 117–93 ✗missed +26
Jan 30 at DEN 53% 110–109 L 109–122 ✗missed −14
Jan 27 at UTA 81% 124–111 W 115–103 ✓correct −1
Jan 25 vs BKN 85% 115–100 W 126–89 ✓correct +22
Jan 22 vs LAL 53% 114–113 W 112–104 ✓correct +7
Jan 20 at CHI 41% 111–114 L 110–138 ✓correct −25
Jan 19 at WAS 61% 116–112 W 110–106 ✓correct ±0
Jan 16 at TOR 41% 107–110 W 121–117 ✗missed +7
Jan 14 vs WAS 78% 118–107 W 119–105 ✓correct +3
Jan 12 vs CHA 47% 112–113 W 117–109 ✗missed +9
Jan 10 at DET 39% 109–113 W 98–92 ✗missed +10
Jan 9 at BKN 53% 111–110 W 121–105 ✓correct +15
Jan 7 at NYK 47% 115–116 L 111–123 ✓correct −11
Jan 5 vs GSW 47% 113–114 W 103–102 ✗missed +2
Jan 3 vs BOS 39% 108–112 L 115–146 ✓correct −27
Jan 1 vs UTA 80% 120–108 W 118–101 ✓correct +5
Dec 30 vs SAC 76% 115–105 W 131–90 ✓correct +31
Dec 28 vs DET 34% 111–117 W 112–99 ✗missed +19
Dec 26 at POR 56% 115–113 W 119–103 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 vs HOU 34% 109–115 W 128–108 ✗missed +26
Dec 20 vs LAL 53% 115–114 W 103–88 ✓correct +14
Dec 18 at OKC 11% 107–125 L 101–122 ✓correct −3
Dec 15 vs MEM 44% 113–115 L 103–121 ✓correct −16
Dec 11 at HOU 26% 109–118 L 113–115 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 at MIN 24% 112–122 L 106–109 ✓correct +7
Dec 5 at MEM 47% 114–115 L 98–107 ✓correct −8
Dec 3 at ATL 34% 115–121 W 115–92 ✗missed +29
Dec 1 at MIA 26% 113–122 L 123–140 ✓correct −8
Nov 29 vs DAL 64% 117–112 L 110–114 ✗missed −9
Nov 28 vs MEM 47% 114–115 L 107–112 ✓correct −4
Nov 25 at LAL 34% 111–117 L 118–135 ✓correct −11
Nov 23 at CLE 24% 110–120 L 105–120 ✓correct −5
Nov 22 at CHA 53% 113–112 W 131–116 ✓correct +14
Nov 20 at ORL 31% 108–115 L 101–129 ✓correct −21
Nov 17 at PHI 44% 112–114 L 108–110 ✓correct ±0
Nov 16 at BOS 26% 106–115 L 118–121 ✓correct +6
Nov 14 at DAL 44% 112–114 W 133–127 ✗missed +8
Nov 12 vs DEN 34% 110–116 L 116–130 ✓correct −8
Nov 10 vs ATL 47% 114–115 L 102–105 ✓correct −2
Nov 8 vs PHX 53% 115–114 L 103–114 ✗missed −12
Nov 6 at PHX 47% 112–113 L 102–115 ✓correct −12
Nov 4 vs OKC 36% 107–112 L 107–126 ✓correct −14
Nov 3 vs MIA 64% 115–110 L 119–120 ✗missed −6
Oct 31 vs NOP 82% 116–103 W 126–124 ✓correct −11
Oct 28 at GSW 47% 110–111 L 79–98 ✓correct −18
Oct 26 vs POR 61% 114–110 W 114–107 ✓correct +3
Oct 24 vs PHX 69% 116–109 W 129–102 ✓correct +20
Oct 22 at UTA 71% 119–111 L 108–129 ✗missed −29

2024-25

11.3 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 9.7 to 13.0; 20th smallest of 30
+2.4
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -0.2 to 4.9
14.6 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
70%
winner picked
89 games involving LAC
53 / 48.6
actual / expected wins
gap +4.4
0.201
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 53 actual 48.6 exp. 14589 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 89 margin errors; mean +2.4 points 0612 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 2 games -24 to -20 pts: 1 games -20 to -16 pts: 3 games -16 to -12 pts: 3 games -12 to -8 pts: 6 games -8 to -4 pts: 10 games -4 to 0 pts: 10 games 0 to 4 pts: 12 games 4 to 8 pts: 8 games 8 to 12 pts: 9 games 12 to 16 pts: 8 games 16 to 20 pts: 5 games 20 to 24 pts: 4 games 24 to 28 pts: 2 games 28 to 32 pts: 3 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean +2.4 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2024-25, smallest to largest; LAC is 20 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 CHA: 9.26 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.61–10.89 CHA 9.3 n=82 PHX: 9.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.11–10.93 PHX 9.5 n=82 HOU: 9.50 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.27–10.78 HOU 9.5 n=88 ORL: 10.00 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.64–11.37 ORL 10.0 n=87 DET: 10.03 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.78–11.4 DET 10.0 n=88 PHI: 10.11 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.54–11.87 PHI 10.1 n=82 UTA: 10.12 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.48–12.02 UTA 10.1 n=82 NOP: 10.21 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.57–11.82 NOP 10.2 n=82 MIL: 10.27 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.88–11.77 MIL 10.3 n=86 IND: 10.33 points over 103 games, 90% interval 9.13–11.63 IND 10.3 n=103 SAS: 10.68 points over 80 games, 90% interval 8.99–12.45 SAS 10.7 n=80 ATL: 10.74 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.17 ATL 10.7 n=81 BKN: 10.80 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.33–12.39 BKN 10.8 n=82 WAS: 10.84 points over 81 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.23 WAS 10.8 n=81 MIN: 10.93 points over 97 games, 90% interval 9.53–12.36 MIN 10.9 n=97 DAL: 10.99 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.71–12.43 DAL 11.0 n=82 MIA: 11.04 points over 85 games, 90% interval 9.36–12.89 MIA 11.0 n=85 CLE: 11.07 points over 91 games, 90% interval 9.54–12.6 CLE 11.1 n=91 TOR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.52–12.88 TOR 11.1 n=82 LAC: 11.30 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.74–13 LAC 11.3 n=89 BOS: 11.54 points over 93 games, 90% interval 10.13–13.06 BOS 11.5 n=93 OKC: 11.69 points over 104 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.16 OKC 11.7 n=104 MEM: 11.77 points over 86 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.73 MEM 11.8 n=86 SAC: 11.77 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.07–13.39 SAC 11.8 n=82 NYK: 11.86 points over 100 games, 90% interval 10.5–13.1 NYK 11.9 n=100 LAL: 11.89 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.06–13.62 LAL 11.9 n=87 DEN: 11.91 points over 96 games, 90% interval 10.55–13.48 DEN 11.9 n=96 GSW: 12.33 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.68–13.97 GSW 12.3 n=94 CHI: 12.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.89–13.89 CHI 12.4 n=82 POR: 13.05 points over 82 games, 90% interval 11.32–14.91 POR 13.1 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 89 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
May 3 PO at DEN 38% 102–106 L 101–120 ✓correct −15
May 1 PO vs DEN 64% 109–104 W 111–105 ✓correct +1
Apr 29 PO at DEN 61% 105–100 L 115–131 ✗missed −21
Apr 26 PO vs DEN 62% 107–103 L 99–101 ✗missed −6
Apr 24 PO vs DEN 62% 108–104 W 117–83 ✓correct +30
Apr 21 PO at DEN 43% 105–107 W 105–102 ✗missed +5
Apr 19 PO at DEN 43% 107–109 L 110–112 ✓correct ±0
Apr 13 at GSW 51% 111–110 W 124–119 ✓correct +4
Apr 11 at SAC 64% 115–109 W 101–100 ✓correct −5
Apr 9 vs HOU 62% 113–109 W 134–117 ✓correct +13
Apr 8 vs SAS 77% 121–110 W 122–117 ✓correct −6
Apr 5 vs DAL 77% 121–110 W 135–104 ✓correct +20
Apr 4 vs DAL 73% 120–111 W 114–91 ✓correct +14
Apr 2 vs NOP 82% 119–105 W 114–98 ✓correct +2
Mar 31 at ORL 51% 110–109 W 96–87 ✓correct +8
Mar 30 at CLE 41% 113–116 L 122–127 ✓correct −2
Mar 28 at BKN 79% 116–103 W 132–100 ✓correct +19
Mar 26 at NYK 51% 109–108 W 126–113 ✓correct +12
Mar 23 vs OKC 44% 111–114 L 101–103 ✓correct +1
Mar 21 vs MEM 67% 116–110 W 128–108 ✓correct +14
Mar 18 vs CLE 41% 108–112 W 132–119 ✗missed +17
Mar 16 vs CHA 81% 118–105 W 123–88 ✓correct +22
Mar 14 at ATL 46% 116–117 W 121–98 ✗missed +24
Mar 12 at MIA 46% 109–110 W 119–104 ✗missed +16
Mar 11 at NOP 61% 114–109 L 120–127 ✗missed −12
Mar 9 vs SAC 59% 110–107 W 111–110 ✓correct −2
Mar 7 vs NYK 59% 114–111 W 105–95 ✓correct +7
Mar 5 vs DET 39% 113–118 W 123–115 ✗missed +13
Mar 4 at PHX 46% 116–117 L 117–119 ✓correct −1
Mar 2 at LAL 38% 113–117 L 102–108 ✓correct −2
Feb 28 at LAL 38% 114–118 L 102–106 ✓correct ±0
Feb 26 at CHI 56% 118–115 W 122–117 ✓correct +2
Feb 24 at DET 31% 115–122 L 97–106 ✓correct −2
Feb 23 at IND 29% 114–122 L 111–129 ✓correct −10
Feb 20 at MIL 51% 117–116 L 110–116 ✗missed −7
Feb 13 at UTA 64% 120–114 W 120–116 ✓correct −2
Feb 12 vs MEM 59% 120–117 W 128–114 ✓correct +11
Feb 8 vs UTA 79% 121–109 W 130–110 ✓correct +8
Feb 6 vs IND 46% 112–114 L 112–119 ✓correct −5
Feb 4 vs LAL 57% 110–108 L 97–122 ✗missed −27
Feb 2 at TOR 56% 110–107 L 108–115 ✗missed −10
Jan 31 at CHA 73% 115–105 W 112–104 ✓correct −2
Jan 29 at SAS 61% 116–111 W 128–116 ✓correct +7
Jan 27 at PHX 51% 113–112 L 109–111 ✗missed −3
Jan 25 vs MIL 62% 114–110 W 127–117 ✓correct +6
Jan 23 vs WAS 84% 122–107 W 110–93 ✓correct +2
Jan 22 vs BOS 32% 102–110 L 113–117 ✓correct +4
Jan 20 vs CHI 69% 118–111 L 99–112 ✗missed −20
Jan 19 vs LAL 59% 111–108 W 116–102 ✓correct +11
Jan 16 at POR 61% 115–110 W 118–89 ✓correct +24
Jan 15 vs BKN 77% 116–105 W 126–67 ✓correct +48
Jan 13 vs MIA 57% 110–108 W 109–98 ✓correct +9
Jan 8 at DEN 36% 114–119 L 103–126 ✓correct −18
Jan 6 at MIN 51% 113–112 L 106–108 ✗missed −3
Jan 4 vs ATL 64% 118–113 W 131–105 ✓correct +21
Jan 2 at OKC 18% 107–121 L 98–116 ✓correct −4
Dec 31 at SAS 54% 114–112 L 86–122 ✗missed −38
Dec 30 at NOP 71% 121–112 W 116–113 ✓correct −6
Dec 27 vs GSW 69% 114–107 W 102–92 ✓correct +3
Dec 23 at MEM 31% 113–120 W 114–110 ✗missed +11
Dec 21 at DAL 36% 113–118 L 97–113 ✓correct −11
Dec 19 at DAL 31% 111–118 W 118–95 ✗missed +30
Dec 16 vs UTA 73% 116–107 W 144–107 ✓correct +28
Dec 13 at DEN 33% 114–120 L 98–120 ✓correct −16
Dec 8 vs HOU 57% 113–111 L 106–117 ✗missed −13
Dec 4 vs MIN 64% 109–104 L 80–108 ✗missed −33
Dec 3 vs POR 77% 118–107 W 127–105 ✓correct +11
Dec 1 vs DEN 57% 115–113 W 126–122 ✓correct +2
Nov 29 at MIN 46% 110–111 L 92–93 ✓correct ±0
Nov 27 at WAS 66% 119–112 W 121–96 ✓correct +18
Nov 25 at BOS 31% 109–116 L 94–126 ✓correct −25
Nov 24 at PHI 56% 108–105 W 125–99 ✓correct +23
Nov 22 vs SAC 54% 109–108 W 104–88 ✓correct +15
Nov 20 vs ORL 49% 106–107 W 104–93 ✗missed +12
Nov 18 vs GSW 46% 113–115 W 102–99 ✗missed +5
Nov 17 vs UTA 75% 117–107 W 116–105 ✓correct +1
Nov 15 at HOU 43% 107–109 L 104–125 ✓correct −19
Nov 13 at HOU 41% 108–111 L 103–111 ✓correct −5
Nov 11 at OKC 27% 108–117 L 128–134 ✓correct +3
Nov 9 vs TOR 75% 118–108 W 105–103 ✓correct −8
Nov 8 at SAC 36% 108–113 W 107–98 ✗missed +14
Nov 6 vs PHI 59% 110–107 W 110–98 ✓correct +9
Nov 4 vs SAS 64% 111–106 W 113–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 2 vs OKC 49% 106–107 L 92–105 ✓correct −12
Oct 31 vs PHX 57% 109–107 L 119–125 ✗missed −8
Oct 30 vs POR 75% 113–103 L 105–106 ✗missed −11
Oct 27 at GSW 29% 108–116 W 112–104 ✗missed +16
Oct 26 at DEN 38% 105–109 W 109–104 ✗missed +9
Oct 23 vs PHX 62% 110–106 L 113–116 ✗missed −7

2023-24

10.3 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 8.9 to 11.7; 7th smallest of 30
−0.6
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.7 to 1.7
13.2 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.3
71%
winner picked
88 games involving LAC
53 / 49.3
actual / expected wins
gap +3.7
0.224
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 01020304050 53 actual 49.3 exp. 14488 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -40-200+20+40 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 88 margin errors; mean -0.6 points 0713 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 1 games -32 to -28 pts: 1 games -28 to -24 pts: 1 games -24 to -20 pts: 3 games -20 to -16 pts: 2 games -16 to -12 pts: 9 games -12 to -8 pts: 7 games -8 to -4 pts: 8 games -4 to 0 pts: 9 games 0 to 4 pts: 12 games 4 to 8 pts: 13 games 8 to 12 pts: 8 games 12 to 16 pts: 2 games 16 to 20 pts: 5 games 20 to 24 pts: 6 games 24 to 28 pts: 0 games 28 to 32 pts: 0 games 32 to 36 pts: 1 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -0.6 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2023-24, smallest to largest; LAC is 7 of 30 79111315 median 11.0 PHX: 9.80 points over 86 games, 90% interval 8.63–11.01 PHX 9.8 n=86 WAS: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.41–11.39 WAS 9.9 n=82 DET: 9.91 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.51–11.34 DET 9.9 n=82 CHI: 9.93 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.67–11.28 CHI 9.9 n=82 GSW: 10.13 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.49–11.84 GSW 10.1 n=82 DEN: 10.16 points over 94 games, 90% interval 8.71–11.82 DEN 10.2 n=94 LAC: 10.31 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.94–11.67 LAC 10.3 n=88 HOU: 10.49 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.09–11.87 HOU 10.5 n=82 CHA: 10.60 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.87–12.37 CHA 10.6 n=82 SAS: 10.68 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.16–12.34 SAS 10.7 n=82 TOR: 10.71 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.94–12.41 TOR 10.7 n=82 PHI: 10.78 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.32–12.18 PHI 10.8 n=88 LAL: 10.83 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.37 LAL 10.8 n=87 MIN: 10.89 points over 98 games, 90% interval 9.4–12.27 MIN 10.9 n=98 ORL: 10.98 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.61–12.31 ORL 11.0 n=89 MIA: 10.99 points over 87 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.83 MIA 11.0 n=87 MEM: 11.02 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.62–12.49 MEM 11.0 n=82 POR: 11.09 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.3–12.93 POR 11.1 n=82 BKN: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.12 BKN 11.4 n=82 ATL: 11.43 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.74–13.3 ATL 11.4 n=82 NYK: 11.46 points over 95 games, 90% interval 10.13–12.84 NYK 11.5 n=95 CLE: 11.88 points over 94 games, 90% interval 10.45–13.49 CLE 11.9 n=94 UTA: 11.94 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.29–13.62 UTA 11.9 n=82 OKC: 12.10 points over 92 games, 90% interval 10.34–13.93 OKC 12.1 n=92 MIL: 12.23 points over 88 games, 90% interval 10.58–13.77 MIL 12.2 n=88 SAC: 12.38 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.73–14.11 SAC 12.4 n=82 IND: 12.71 points over 99 games, 90% interval 11.15–14.27 IND 12.7 n=99 BOS: 12.86 points over 101 games, 90% interval 11.3–14.57 BOS 12.9 n=101 DAL: 13.09 points over 104 games, 90% interval 11.49–14.72 DAL 13.1 n=104 NOP: 13.56 points over 86 games, 90% interval 11.94–15.36 NOP 13.6 n=86 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 88 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
May 3 PO at DAL 34% 103–109 L 101–114 ✓correct −7
May 1 PO vs DAL 59% 107–105 L 93–123 ✗missed −32
Apr 28 PO at DAL 37% 106–110 W 116–111 ✗missed +9
Apr 26 PO at DAL 34% 106–112 L 90–101 ✓correct −5
Apr 23 PO vs DAL 67% 112–106 L 93–96 ✗missed −9
Apr 21 PO vs DAL 63% 112–108 W 109–97 ✓correct +8
Apr 14 vs HOU 65% 112–107 L 105–116 ✗missed −16
Apr 12 vs UTA 76% 116–104 L 109–110 ✗missed −13
Apr 10 vs PHX 49% 109–112 L 108–124 ✓correct −13
Apr 9 at PHX 30% 107–115 W 105–92 ✗missed +21
Apr 7 vs CLE 59% 110–108 W 120–118 ✓correct ±0
Apr 5 vs UTA 79% 114–100 W 131–102 ✓correct +15
Apr 4 vs DEN 57% 110–109 W 102–100 ✓correct +1
Apr 2 at SAC 47% 109–108 L 95–109 ✗missed −15
Mar 31 at CHA 61% 115–107 W 130–118 ✓correct +4
Mar 29 at ORL 47% 110–109 W 100–97 ✓correct +2
Mar 27 at PHI 51% 110–107 W 108–107 ✓correct −2
Mar 25 vs IND 61% 116–113 L 116–133 ✗missed −20
Mar 24 vs PHI 65% 110–105 L 107–121 ✗missed −19
Mar 22 at POR 69% 117–105 W 125–117 ✓correct −4
Mar 20 at POR 63% 115–106 W 116–103 ✓correct +4
Mar 17 vs ATL 65% 111–106 L 93–110 ✗missed −22
Mar 15 at NOP 35% 108–113 L 104–112 ✓correct −3
Mar 14 at CHI 55% 114–109 W 126–111 ✓correct +10
Mar 12 vs MIN 67% 113–107 L 100–118 ✗missed −24
Mar 10 vs MIL 53% 111–112 L 117–124 ✓correct −6
Mar 9 vs CHI 63% 113–109 W 112–102 ✓correct +6
Mar 6 at HOU 53% 116–112 W 122–116 ✓correct +2
Mar 4 at MIL 35% 108–113 L 106–113 ✓correct −2
Mar 3 at MIN 37% 112–116 W 89–88 ✗missed +5
Mar 1 vs WAS 81% 123–108 W 140–115 ✓correct +10
Feb 28 vs LAL 63% 119–115 L 112–116 ✗missed −8
Feb 25 vs SAC 70% 121–113 L 107–123 ✗missed −24
Feb 23 at MEM 51% 117–114 W 101–95 ✓correct +3
Feb 22 at OKC 32% 109–116 L 107–129 ✓correct −15
Feb 14 at GSW 37% 114–118 W 130–125 ✗missed +9
Feb 12 vs MIN 63% 113–109 L 100–121 ✗missed −25
Feb 10 vs DET 84% 127–109 W 112–106 ✓correct −12
Feb 7 vs NOP 65% 117–112 L 106–117 ✗missed −16
Feb 5 at ATL 53% 121–117 W 149–144 ✓correct +1
Feb 4 at MIA 61% 116–108 W 103–95 ✓correct ±0
Feb 2 at DET 57% 121–115 W 136–125 ✓correct +5
Jan 31 at WAS 59% 117–110 W 125–109 ✓correct +9
Jan 29 at CLE 43% 111–112 L 108–118 ✓correct −9
Jan 27 at BOS 43% 110–111 W 115–96 ✗missed +20
Jan 26 at TOR 49% 117–115 W 127–107 ✓correct +18
Jan 23 vs LAL 68% 118–111 W 127–116 ✓correct +4
Jan 21 vs BKN 76% 118–106 W 125–114 ✓correct −1
Jan 16 vs OKC 61% 114–111 W 128–117 ✓correct +8
Jan 14 at MIN 39% 107–110 L 105–109 ✓correct −1
Jan 12 at MEM 59% 115–108 W 128–119 ✓correct +2
Jan 10 vs TOR 67% 119–113 W 126–120 ✓correct ±0
Jan 8 vs PHX 63% 116–112 W 138–111 ✓correct +23
Jan 7 at LAL 57% 117–111 L 103–106 ✗missed −9
Jan 5 at NOP 43% 111–112 W 111–95 ✗missed +17
Jan 3 at PHX 49% 115–113 W 131–122 ✓correct +7
Jan 1 vs MIA 57% 117–116 W 121–104 ✓correct +16
Dec 29 vs MEM 68% 119–112 W 117–106 ✓correct +4
Dec 26 vs CHA 78% 120–107 W 113–104 ✓correct −4
Dec 23 vs BOS 53% 114–115 L 108–145 ✓correct −36
Dec 21 at OKC 35% 112–117 L 115–134 ✓correct −14
Dec 20 at DAL 53% 117–113 W 120–111 ✓correct +5
Dec 18 at IND 51% 119–116 W 151–127 ✓correct +21
Dec 16 vs NYK 59% 113–111 W 144–122 ✓correct +20
Dec 14 vs GSW 67% 118–112 W 121–113 ✓correct +2
Dec 12 vs SAC 67% 118–112 W 119–99 ✓correct +14
Dec 11 vs POR 75% 115–104 W 132–127 ✓correct −6
Dec 8 at UTA 59% 116–109 W 117–103 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 vs DEN 63% 115–111 W 111–102 ✓correct +5
Dec 2 vs GSW 67% 115–109 W 113–112 ✓correct −5
Nov 30 at GSW 43% 114–115 L 114–120 ✓correct −5
Nov 29 at SAC 35% 112–117 W 131–117 ✗missed +19
Nov 27 vs DEN 65% 113–108 L 104–113 ✗missed −14
Nov 25 vs DAL 61% 117–114 W 107–88 ✓correct +16
Nov 24 vs NOP 59% 115–113 L 106–116 ✗missed −12
Nov 22 at SAS 53% 118–114 W 109–102 ✓correct +3
Nov 20 at SAS 55% 118–113 W 124–99 ✓correct +20
Nov 17 vs HOU 59% 113–111 W 106–100 ✓correct +4
Nov 14 at DEN 41% 112–114 L 108–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 12 vs MEM 68% 118–111 L 101–105 ✗missed −11
Nov 10 at DAL 39% 115–118 L 126–144 ✓correct −15
Nov 8 at BKN 47% 115–114 L 93–100 ✗missed −8
Nov 6 at NYK 39% 109–112 L 97–111 ✓correct −11
Nov 1 at LAL 35% 112–117 L 125–130 ✓correct ±0
Oct 31 vs ORL 65% 118–113 W 118–102 ✓correct +11
Oct 29 vs SAS 67% 121–115 W 123–83 ✓correct +34
Oct 27 at UTA 49% 118–116 L 118–120 ✗missed −4
Oct 25 vs POR 68% 120–113 W 123–111 ✓correct +5

2022-23

9.9 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 8.8 to 11.2; 11th smallest of 30
−0.2
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -2.3 to 1.9
12.1 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 10.3
61%
winner picked
87 games involving LAC
45 / 44.1
actual / expected wins
gap +0.9
0.227
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 010203040 45 actual 44.1 exp. 14487 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -30-150+15+30 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 87 margin errors; mean -0.2 points 0713 -40 to -36 pts: 0 games -36 to -32 pts: 0 games -32 to -28 pts: 0 games -28 to -24 pts: 3 games -24 to -20 pts: 1 games -20 to -16 pts: 7 games -16 to -12 pts: 4 games -12 to -8 pts: 8 games -8 to -4 pts: 8 games -4 to 0 pts: 11 games 0 to 4 pts: 7 games 4 to 8 pts: 13 games 8 to 12 pts: 8 games 12 to 16 pts: 12 games 16 to 20 pts: 0 games 20 to 24 pts: 3 games 24 to 28 pts: 1 games 28 to 32 pts: 1 games 32 to 36 pts: 0 games 36 to 40 pts: 0 games mean -0.2 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23, smallest to largest; LAC is 12 of 30 68101214 median 10.2 UTA: 8.74 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.41–10.06 UTA 8.7 n=82 DET: 8.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.57–10.1 DET 8.8 n=82 HOU: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.78–10.33 HOU 9.1 n=82 IND: 9.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.91–10.26 IND 9.1 n=82 LAL: 9.19 points over 98 games, 90% interval 8.13–10.45 LAL 9.2 n=98 TOR: 9.30 points over 82 games, 90% interval 7.98–10.65 TOR 9.3 n=82 MIA: 9.42 points over 105 games, 90% interval 8.16–10.73 MIA 9.4 n=105 CLE: 9.63 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.79 CLE 9.6 n=87 NYK: 9.65 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.48–10.83 NYK 9.7 n=93 ORL: 9.88 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.6–11.21 ORL 9.9 n=82 DAL: 9.90 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.27–11.59 DAL 9.9 n=82 LAC: 9.90 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.76–11.17 LAC 9.9 n=87 WAS: 10.06 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.61–11.52 WAS 10.1 n=82 ATL: 10.20 points over 88 games, 90% interval 8.92–11.51 ATL 10.2 n=88 PHI: 10.20 points over 93 games, 90% interval 8.81–11.6 PHI 10.2 n=93 MIN: 10.21 points over 87 games, 90% interval 8.99–11.47 MIN 10.2 n=87 OKC: 10.23 points over 82 games, 90% interval 8.93–11.55 OKC 10.2 n=82 DEN: 10.51 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.1–11.93 DEN 10.5 n=102 PHX: 10.81 points over 93 games, 90% interval 9.25–12.28 PHX 10.8 n=93 NOP: 10.82 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.34–12.26 NOP 10.8 n=82 CHA: 10.84 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.38–12.3 CHA 10.8 n=82 SAC: 10.99 points over 89 games, 90% interval 9.44–12.58 SAC 11.0 n=89 GSW: 11.24 points over 95 games, 90% interval 9.8–12.77 GSW 11.2 n=95 MEM: 11.40 points over 88 games, 90% interval 9.83–13.05 MEM 11.4 n=88 POR: 11.41 points over 82 games, 90% interval 9.96–12.94 POR 11.4 n=82 BKN: 11.45 points over 86 games, 90% interval 9.79–13.3 BKN 11.4 n=86 BOS: 11.54 points over 102 games, 90% interval 9.99–13.05 BOS 11.5 n=102 CHI: 11.72 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.11–13.48 CHI 11.7 n=82 MIL: 11.77 points over 87 games, 90% interval 10.3–13.32 MIL 11.8 n=87 SAS: 12.16 points over 82 games, 90% interval 10.54–13.79 SAS 12.2 n=82 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 87 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Apr 25 PO at PHX 26% 106–116 L 130–136 ✓correct +4
Apr 22 PO vs PHX 63% 114–109 L 100–112 ✗missed −17
Apr 20 PO vs PHX 63% 116–111 L 124–129 ✗missed −10
Apr 18 PO at PHX 30% 112–120 L 109–123 ✓correct −6
Apr 16 PO at PHX 28% 108–117 W 115–110 ✗missed +14
Apr 9 at PHX 42% 112–115 W 119–114 ✗missed +8
Apr 8 vs POR 72% 124–115 W 136–125 ✓correct +2
Apr 5 vs LAL 53% 116–115 W 125–118 ✓correct +6
Apr 1 at NOP 37% 111–116 L 114–122 ✓correct −3
Mar 31 at MEM 37% 110–115 L 94–108 ✓correct −9
Mar 29 at MEM 42% 110–113 W 141–132 ✗missed +12
Mar 27 vs CHI 60% 111–107 W 124–112 ✓correct +8
Mar 25 vs NOP 63% 114–109 L 110–131 ✗missed −26
Mar 23 vs OKC 47% 113–114 W 127–105 ✗missed +23
Mar 21 vs OKC 53% 116–115 L 100–101 ✗missed −2
Mar 19 at POR 70% 125–117 W 117–102 ✓correct +7
Mar 18 vs ORL 55% 118–116 L 108–113 ✗missed −7
Mar 15 vs GSW 55% 117–115 W 134–126 ✓correct +6
Mar 11 vs NYK 58% 119–116 W 106–95 ✓correct +8
Mar 8 vs TOR 45% 115–117 W 108–100 ✗missed +10
Mar 5 vs MEM 53% 116–115 W 135–129 ✓correct +5
Mar 3 at SAC 40% 116–120 L 127–128 ✓correct +3
Mar 2 at GSW 42% 116–119 L 91–115 ✓correct −21
Feb 28 vs MIN 63% 119–114 L 101–108 ✗missed −12
Feb 26 at DEN 37% 110–115 L 124–134 ✓correct −5
Feb 24 vs SAC 55% 116–114 L 175–176 ✗missed −3
Feb 16 at PHX 40% 111–115 W 116–107 ✗missed +13
Feb 14 vs GSW 74% 125–115 W 134–124 ✓correct ±0
Feb 10 vs MIL 63% 119–114 L 106–119 ✗missed −18
Feb 8 vs DAL 58% 110–107 L 104–110 ✗missed −9
Feb 6 at BKN 47% 117–118 W 124–116 ✗missed +9
Feb 4 at NYK 42% 113–116 W 134–128 ✗missed +9
Feb 2 at MIL 37% 113–118 L 105–106 ✓correct +4
Jan 31 at CHI 45% 114–116 W 108–103 ✗missed +7
Jan 29 at CLE 28% 110–119 L 99–122 ✓correct −14
Jan 28 at ATL 35% 112–118 W 120–113 ✗missed +13
Jan 26 vs SAS 78% 123–111 W 138–100 ✓correct +26
Jan 24 at LAL 45% 114–116 W 133–115 ✗missed +20
Jan 22 at DAL 35% 109–115 W 112–98 ✗missed +20
Jan 20 at SAS 65% 122–116 W 131–126 ✓correct −1
Jan 18 at UTA 35% 115–121 L 103–126 ✓correct −17
Jan 17 vs PHI 42% 114–117 L 110–120 ✓correct −7
Jan 15 vs HOU 72% 119–110 W 121–100 ✓correct +12
Jan 13 vs DEN 53% 114–113 L 103–115 ✗missed −13
Jan 10 vs DAL 42% 112–115 W 113–101 ✗missed +15
Jan 8 vs ATL 45% 116–118 L 108–112 ✓correct −2
Jan 6 at MIN 47% 116–117 L 115–128 ✓correct −12
Jan 5 at DEN 42% 112–115 L 91–122 ✓correct −28
Jan 2 vs MIA 47% 110–111 L 100–110 ✓correct −9
Dec 31 at IND 60% 116–112 L 130–131 ✗missed −5
Dec 29 at BOS 37% 112–117 L 110–116 ✓correct −1
Dec 27 at TOR 47% 112–113 W 124–113 ✗missed +12
Dec 26 at DET 68% 116–109 W 142–131 ✓correct +4
Dec 23 at PHI 47% 109–110 L 114–119 ✓correct −4
Dec 21 vs CHA 80% 118–105 W 126–105 ✓correct +8
Dec 17 vs WAS 55% 116–114 W 102–93 ✓correct +7
Dec 15 vs PHX 28% 106–115 L 95–111 ✓correct −7
Dec 14 vs MIN 58% 114–111 W 99–88 ✓correct +8
Dec 12 vs BOS 30% 109–117 W 113–93 ✗missed +28
Dec 10 at WAS 53% 116–115 W 114–107 ✓correct +6
Dec 8 at MIA 32% 106–113 L 110–115 ✓correct +2
Dec 7 at ORL 53% 111–110 L 111–116 ✗missed −6
Dec 5 at CHA 63% 112–107 W 119–117 ✓correct −3
Dec 3 vs SAC 53% 117–116 L 96–123 ✗missed −28
Nov 30 at UTA 42% 112–115 L 112–125 ✓correct −10
Nov 29 at POR 55% 111–109 W 118–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 27 vs IND 53% 113–112 W 114–100 ✓correct +13
Nov 25 vs DEN 47% 108–109 L 104–114 ✓correct −9
Nov 23 at GSW 40% 110–114 L 107–124 ✓correct −13
Nov 21 vs UTA 35% 108–114 W 121–114 ✗missed +13
Nov 19 vs SAS 74% 115–105 W 119–97 ✓correct +12
Nov 17 vs DET 80% 116–103 W 96–91 ✓correct −8
Nov 15 at DAL 42% 106–109 L 101–103 ✓correct +1
Nov 14 at HOU 58% 113–110 W 122–106 ✓correct +13
Nov 12 vs BKN 55% 107–105 L 95–110 ✗missed −17
Nov 9 vs LAL 65% 111–105 W 114–101 ✓correct +7
Nov 7 vs CLE 26% 100–110 W 119–117 ✗missed +12
Nov 6 vs UTA 37% 106–111 L 102–110 ✓correct −3
Nov 4 at SAS 55% 110–108 W 113–106 ✓correct +5
Nov 2 at HOU 68% 113–106 W 109–101 ✓correct +1
Oct 31 vs HOU 63% 113–108 W 95–93 ✓correct −3
Oct 30 vs NOP 45% 110–112 L 91–112 ✓correct −19
Oct 27 at OKC 63% 112–107 L 110–118 ✗missed −13
Oct 25 at OKC 58% 114–111 L 94–108 ✗missed −17
Oct 23 vs PHX 55% 107–105 L 95–112 ✗missed −19
Oct 22 at SAC 65% 116–110 W 111–109 ✓correct −4
Oct 20 at LAL 63% 120–115 W 103–97 ✓correct +1

2022-23 to 2026-27

10.8 pts
average margin miss
90% interval 10.0 to 11.5; 11th smallest of 30
+0.3
average margin error
+ = better than forecast; 90% interval -0.8 to 1.5
13.6 pts
error variability
std. deviation; league margin miss 11.0
68%
winner picked
355 games involving LAC
195 / 189.3
actual / expected wins
gap +5.7
0.213
Brier score
0.25 = coin flip; lower is better

Expected and actual wins

LAC: cumulative expected wins from pregame win probabilities against actual wins 0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190 195 actual 189.3 exp. 1178355 Game number in sample
Solid: actual wins. Dashed: expected wins, the running sum of LAC's pregame win probability in each game.

Margin error, game by game

LAC: margin forecast error in each game, actual minus predicted -50-250+25+50 Better than forecast Worse than forecast Games in date order
Each bar is one game: LAC's actual margin minus its predicted margin, in points. Positive bars sit above the line and negative bars below it, so direction does not depend on color.

How the errors are spread

LAC: distribution of 355 margin errors; mean +0.4 points 02243 -40 to -36 pts: 1 games -36 to -32 pts: 2 games -32 to -28 pts: 3 games -28 to -24 pts: 9 games -24 to -20 pts: 7 games -20 to -16 pts: 18 games -16 to -12 pts: 22 games -12 to -8 pts: 27 games -8 to -4 pts: 34 games -4 to 0 pts: 43 games 0 to 4 pts: 43 games 4 to 8 pts: 42 games 8 to 12 pts: 30 games 12 to 16 pts: 28 games 16 to 20 pts: 13 games 20 to 24 pts: 19 games 24 to 28 pts: 6 games 28 to 32 pts: 6 games 32 to 36 pts: 1 games 36 to 40 pts: 1 games mean +0.4 -40-200+20+40 worse than forecast better than forecast
Each bar counts games whose margin error fell in a 4-point range (errors beyond ±40 are in the end bars). Dashed line: the average error.

LAC against the league

Average margin miss by team, 2022-23 to 2026-27, smallest to largest; LAC is 11 of 30 891011121314 median 11.0 DET: 9.80 points over 356 games, 90% interval 9.17–10.47 DET 9.8 n=356 HOU: 10.09 points over 350 games, 90% interval 9.46–10.73 HOU 10.1 n=350 PHX: 10.25 points over 355 games, 90% interval 9.56–10.97 PHX 10.3 n=355 ORL: 10.50 points over 353 games, 90% interval 9.8–11.22 ORL 10.5 n=353 UTA: 10.63 points over 338 games, 90% interval 9.81–11.47 UTA 10.6 n=338 PHI: 10.64 points over 367 games, 90% interval 9.93–11.41 PHI 10.6 n=367 IND: 10.67 points over 376 games, 90% interval 9.99–11.4 IND 10.7 n=376 LAL: 10.71 points over 375 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.43 LAL 10.7 n=375 CLE: 10.74 points over 382 games, 90% interval 10.07–11.47 CLE 10.7 n=382 WAS: 10.74 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.06–11.49 WAS 10.7 n=337 LAC: 10.76 points over 355 games, 90% interval 10.03–11.52 LAC 10.8 n=355 DEN: 10.83 points over 388 games, 90% interval 10.1–11.61 DEN 10.8 n=388 SAS: 10.88 points over 357 games, 90% interval 10.14–11.63 SAS 10.9 n=357 MIA: 10.95 points over 369 games, 90% interval 10.19–11.7 MIA 10.9 n=369 NOP: 10.98 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.27–11.74 NOP 11.0 n=342 TOR: 11.08 points over 344 games, 90% interval 10.29–11.88 TOR 11.1 n=344 GSW: 11.12 points over 363 games, 90% interval 10.4–11.91 GSW 11.1 n=363 DAL: 11.15 points over 359 games, 90% interval 10.45–11.87 DAL 11.2 n=359 CHA: 11.18 points over 338 games, 90% interval 10.34–12.05 CHA 11.2 n=338 MIN: 11.18 points over 387 games, 90% interval 10.53–11.91 MIN 11.2 n=387 ATL: 11.32 points over 350 games, 90% interval 10.57–12.13 ATL 11.3 n=350 MEM: 11.35 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.54–12.23 MEM 11.3 n=345 CHI: 11.43 points over 337 games, 90% interval 10.66–12.23 CHI 11.4 n=337 OKC: 11.49 points over 384 games, 90% interval 10.7–12.29 OKC 11.5 n=384 BKN: 11.55 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.41 BKN 11.6 n=342 POR: 11.61 points over 342 games, 90% interval 10.75–12.42 POR 11.6 n=342 NYK: 11.63 points over 396 games, 90% interval 10.88–12.36 NYK 11.6 n=396 SAC: 11.66 points over 345 games, 90% interval 10.84–12.46 SAC 11.7 n=345 MIL: 11.68 points over 353 games, 90% interval 10.92–12.46 MIL 11.7 n=353 BOS: 11.96 points over 395 games, 90% interval 11.24–12.73 BOS 12.0 n=395 average margin miss, points (lower = easier to forecast)
Dots: average absolute margin error per team. Lines: 90% bootstrap intervals; overlapping lines mean the difference between those teams is not clear in this sample. Hollow dots: fewer than 20 games.
All 355 games in this sample
DateOpponentLAC win prob.ProjectedFinalPickMargin error
Nov 8 vs NOP 61% 119–115 W 139–123 ✓correct +12
Nov 4 vs MIA 42% 116–120 L 116–117 ✓correct +3
Nov 2 vs TOR 41% 113–116 L 118–125 ✓correct −4
Nov 1 at GSW 53% 113–112 L 112–124 ✗missed −13
Oct 30 at MIN 44% 113–115 L 101–127 ✓correct −24
Oct 28 vs LAL 62% 115–111 L 87–103 ✗missed −20
Oct 25 at OKC 26% 108–117 L 101–108 ✓correct +2
Oct 23 at LAL 44% 111–113 L 117–125 ✓correct −6
Oct 21 vs SAC 69% 118–111 W 121–96 ✓correct +18
Apr 12 vs GSW 71% 117–109 W 115–110 ✓correct −3
Apr 10 at POR 47% 112–113 L 97–116 ✓correct −18
Apr 8 vs OKC 44% 110–112 L 110–128 ✓correct −16
Apr 7 vs DAL 83% 127–113 W 116–103 ✓correct −1
Apr 5 at SAC 74% 119–110 W 138–109 ✓correct +20
Apr 2 vs SAS 47% 112–113 L 99–118 ✓correct −18
Mar 31 vs POR 61% 116–112 L 104–114 ✗missed −14
Mar 29 at MIL 81% 120–107 W 127–113 ✓correct +1
Mar 27 at IND 71% 122–114 W 114–113 ✓correct −7
Mar 25 vs TOR 56% 118–116 W 119–94 ✓correct +23
Mar 23 vs MIL 76% 121–111 W 129–96 ✓correct +23
Mar 21 at DAL 66% 122–116 W 138–131 ✓correct +1
Mar 19 at NOP 53% 118–117 L 99–105 ✗missed −7
Mar 18 at NOP 56% 120–118 L 109–124 ✗missed −17
Mar 16 vs SAS 36% 111–116 L 115–119 ✓correct +1
Mar 14 vs SAC 86% 125–109 L 109–118 ✗missed −25
Mar 13 vs CHI 80% 124–112 W 119–108 ✓correct −1
Mar 11 vs MIN 56% 116–114 W 153–128 ✓correct +23
Mar 9 vs NYK 47% 110–111 W 126–118 ✗missed +9
Mar 7 at MEM 58% 117–114 W 123–120 ✓correct ±0
Mar 6 at SAS 26% 110–119 L 112–116 ✓correct +5
Mar 4 vs IND 83% 121–107 W 130–107 ✓correct +9
Mar 2 at GSW 47% 112–113 W 114–101 ✗missed +14
Mar 1 vs NOP 61% 116–112 W 137–117 ✓correct +16
Feb 26 vs MIN 44% 113–115 L 88–94 ✓correct −4
Feb 22 vs ORL 53% 114–113 L 109–111 ✗missed −3
Feb 20 at LAL 47% 113–114 L 122–125 ✓correct −2
Feb 19 vs DEN 53% 111–110 W 115–114 ✓correct ±0
Feb 11 at HOU 47% 108–109 W 105–102 ✗missed +4
Feb 10 at HOU 39% 108–112 L 95–102 ✓correct −3
Feb 8 at MIN 34% 113–119 W 115–96 ✗missed +25
Feb 6 at SAC 64% 115–110 W 114–111 ✓correct −2
Feb 4 vs CLE 44% 112–114 L 91–124 ✓correct −31
Feb 2 vs PHI 59% 115–112 L 113–128 ✗missed −18
Feb 1 at PHX 44% 109–111 W 117–93 ✗missed +26
Jan 30 at DEN 53% 110–109 L 109–122 ✗missed −14
Jan 27 at UTA 81% 124–111 W 115–103 ✓correct −1
Jan 25 vs BKN 85% 115–100 W 126–89 ✓correct +22
Jan 22 vs LAL 53% 114–113 W 112–104 ✓correct +7
Jan 20 at CHI 41% 111–114 L 110–138 ✓correct −25
Jan 19 at WAS 61% 116–112 W 110–106 ✓correct ±0
Jan 16 at TOR 41% 107–110 W 121–117 ✗missed +7
Jan 14 vs WAS 78% 118–107 W 119–105 ✓correct +3
Jan 12 vs CHA 47% 112–113 W 117–109 ✗missed +9
Jan 10 at DET 39% 109–113 W 98–92 ✗missed +10
Jan 9 at BKN 53% 111–110 W 121–105 ✓correct +15
Jan 7 at NYK 47% 115–116 L 111–123 ✓correct −11
Jan 5 vs GSW 47% 113–114 W 103–102 ✗missed +2
Jan 3 vs BOS 39% 108–112 L 115–146 ✓correct −27
Jan 1 vs UTA 80% 120–108 W 118–101 ✓correct +5
Dec 30 vs SAC 76% 115–105 W 131–90 ✓correct +31
Dec 28 vs DET 34% 111–117 W 112–99 ✗missed +19
Dec 26 at POR 56% 115–113 W 119–103 ✓correct +14
Dec 23 vs HOU 34% 109–115 W 128–108 ✗missed +26
Dec 20 vs LAL 53% 115–114 W 103–88 ✓correct +14
Dec 18 at OKC 11% 107–125 L 101–122 ✓correct −3
Dec 15 vs MEM 44% 113–115 L 103–121 ✓correct −16
Dec 11 at HOU 26% 109–118 L 113–115 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 at MIN 24% 112–122 L 106–109 ✓correct +7
Dec 5 at MEM 47% 114–115 L 98–107 ✓correct −8
Dec 3 at ATL 34% 115–121 W 115–92 ✗missed +29
Dec 1 at MIA 26% 113–122 L 123–140 ✓correct −8
Nov 29 vs DAL 64% 117–112 L 110–114 ✗missed −9
Nov 28 vs MEM 47% 114–115 L 107–112 ✓correct −4
Nov 25 at LAL 34% 111–117 L 118–135 ✓correct −11
Nov 23 at CLE 24% 110–120 L 105–120 ✓correct −5
Nov 22 at CHA 53% 113–112 W 131–116 ✓correct +14
Nov 20 at ORL 31% 108–115 L 101–129 ✓correct −21
Nov 17 at PHI 44% 112–114 L 108–110 ✓correct ±0
Nov 16 at BOS 26% 106–115 L 118–121 ✓correct +6
Nov 14 at DAL 44% 112–114 W 133–127 ✗missed +8
Nov 12 vs DEN 34% 110–116 L 116–130 ✓correct −8
Nov 10 vs ATL 47% 114–115 L 102–105 ✓correct −2
Nov 8 vs PHX 53% 115–114 L 103–114 ✗missed −12
Nov 6 at PHX 47% 112–113 L 102–115 ✓correct −12
Nov 4 vs OKC 36% 107–112 L 107–126 ✓correct −14
Nov 3 vs MIA 64% 115–110 L 119–120 ✗missed −6
Oct 31 vs NOP 82% 116–103 W 126–124 ✓correct −11
Oct 28 at GSW 47% 110–111 L 79–98 ✓correct −18
Oct 26 vs POR 61% 114–110 W 114–107 ✓correct +3
Oct 24 vs PHX 69% 116–109 W 129–102 ✓correct +20
Oct 22 at UTA 71% 119–111 L 108–129 ✗missed −29
May 3 PO at DEN 38% 102–106 L 101–120 ✓correct −15
May 1 PO vs DEN 64% 109–104 W 111–105 ✓correct +1
Apr 29 PO at DEN 61% 105–100 L 115–131 ✗missed −21
Apr 26 PO vs DEN 62% 107–103 L 99–101 ✗missed −6
Apr 24 PO vs DEN 62% 108–104 W 117–83 ✓correct +30
Apr 21 PO at DEN 43% 105–107 W 105–102 ✗missed +5
Apr 19 PO at DEN 43% 107–109 L 110–112 ✓correct ±0
Apr 13 at GSW 51% 111–110 W 124–119 ✓correct +4
Apr 11 at SAC 64% 115–109 W 101–100 ✓correct −5
Apr 9 vs HOU 62% 113–109 W 134–117 ✓correct +13
Apr 8 vs SAS 77% 121–110 W 122–117 ✓correct −6
Apr 5 vs DAL 77% 121–110 W 135–104 ✓correct +20
Apr 4 vs DAL 73% 120–111 W 114–91 ✓correct +14
Apr 2 vs NOP 82% 119–105 W 114–98 ✓correct +2
Mar 31 at ORL 51% 110–109 W 96–87 ✓correct +8
Mar 30 at CLE 41% 113–116 L 122–127 ✓correct −2
Mar 28 at BKN 79% 116–103 W 132–100 ✓correct +19
Mar 26 at NYK 51% 109–108 W 126–113 ✓correct +12
Mar 23 vs OKC 44% 111–114 L 101–103 ✓correct +1
Mar 21 vs MEM 67% 116–110 W 128–108 ✓correct +14
Mar 18 vs CLE 41% 108–112 W 132–119 ✗missed +17
Mar 16 vs CHA 81% 118–105 W 123–88 ✓correct +22
Mar 14 at ATL 46% 116–117 W 121–98 ✗missed +24
Mar 12 at MIA 46% 109–110 W 119–104 ✗missed +16
Mar 11 at NOP 61% 114–109 L 120–127 ✗missed −12
Mar 9 vs SAC 59% 110–107 W 111–110 ✓correct −2
Mar 7 vs NYK 59% 114–111 W 105–95 ✓correct +7
Mar 5 vs DET 39% 113–118 W 123–115 ✗missed +13
Mar 4 at PHX 46% 116–117 L 117–119 ✓correct −1
Mar 2 at LAL 38% 113–117 L 102–108 ✓correct −2
Feb 28 at LAL 38% 114–118 L 102–106 ✓correct ±0
Feb 26 at CHI 56% 118–115 W 122–117 ✓correct +2
Feb 24 at DET 31% 115–122 L 97–106 ✓correct −2
Feb 23 at IND 29% 114–122 L 111–129 ✓correct −10
Feb 20 at MIL 51% 117–116 L 110–116 ✗missed −7
Feb 13 at UTA 64% 120–114 W 120–116 ✓correct −2
Feb 12 vs MEM 59% 120–117 W 128–114 ✓correct +11
Feb 8 vs UTA 79% 121–109 W 130–110 ✓correct +8
Feb 6 vs IND 46% 112–114 L 112–119 ✓correct −5
Feb 4 vs LAL 57% 110–108 L 97–122 ✗missed −27
Feb 2 at TOR 56% 110–107 L 108–115 ✗missed −10
Jan 31 at CHA 73% 115–105 W 112–104 ✓correct −2
Jan 29 at SAS 61% 116–111 W 128–116 ✓correct +7
Jan 27 at PHX 51% 113–112 L 109–111 ✗missed −3
Jan 25 vs MIL 62% 114–110 W 127–117 ✓correct +6
Jan 23 vs WAS 84% 122–107 W 110–93 ✓correct +2
Jan 22 vs BOS 32% 102–110 L 113–117 ✓correct +4
Jan 20 vs CHI 69% 118–111 L 99–112 ✗missed −20
Jan 19 vs LAL 59% 111–108 W 116–102 ✓correct +11
Jan 16 at POR 61% 115–110 W 118–89 ✓correct +24
Jan 15 vs BKN 77% 116–105 W 126–67 ✓correct +48
Jan 13 vs MIA 57% 110–108 W 109–98 ✓correct +9
Jan 8 at DEN 36% 114–119 L 103–126 ✓correct −18
Jan 6 at MIN 51% 113–112 L 106–108 ✗missed −3
Jan 4 vs ATL 64% 118–113 W 131–105 ✓correct +21
Jan 2 at OKC 18% 107–121 L 98–116 ✓correct −4
Dec 31 at SAS 54% 114–112 L 86–122 ✗missed −38
Dec 30 at NOP 71% 121–112 W 116–113 ✓correct −6
Dec 27 vs GSW 69% 114–107 W 102–92 ✓correct +3
Dec 23 at MEM 31% 113–120 W 114–110 ✗missed +11
Dec 21 at DAL 36% 113–118 L 97–113 ✓correct −11
Dec 19 at DAL 31% 111–118 W 118–95 ✗missed +30
Dec 16 vs UTA 73% 116–107 W 144–107 ✓correct +28
Dec 13 at DEN 33% 114–120 L 98–120 ✓correct −16
Dec 8 vs HOU 57% 113–111 L 106–117 ✗missed −13
Dec 4 vs MIN 64% 109–104 L 80–108 ✗missed −33
Dec 3 vs POR 77% 118–107 W 127–105 ✓correct +11
Dec 1 vs DEN 57% 115–113 W 126–122 ✓correct +2
Nov 29 at MIN 46% 110–111 L 92–93 ✓correct ±0
Nov 27 at WAS 66% 119–112 W 121–96 ✓correct +18
Nov 25 at BOS 31% 109–116 L 94–126 ✓correct −25
Nov 24 at PHI 56% 108–105 W 125–99 ✓correct +23
Nov 22 vs SAC 54% 109–108 W 104–88 ✓correct +15
Nov 20 vs ORL 49% 106–107 W 104–93 ✗missed +12
Nov 18 vs GSW 46% 113–115 W 102–99 ✗missed +5
Nov 17 vs UTA 75% 117–107 W 116–105 ✓correct +1
Nov 15 at HOU 43% 107–109 L 104–125 ✓correct −19
Nov 13 at HOU 41% 108–111 L 103–111 ✓correct −5
Nov 11 at OKC 27% 108–117 L 128–134 ✓correct +3
Nov 9 vs TOR 75% 118–108 W 105–103 ✓correct −8
Nov 8 at SAC 36% 108–113 W 107–98 ✗missed +14
Nov 6 vs PHI 59% 110–107 W 110–98 ✓correct +9
Nov 4 vs SAS 64% 111–106 W 113–104 ✓correct +4
Nov 2 vs OKC 49% 106–107 L 92–105 ✓correct −12
Oct 31 vs PHX 57% 109–107 L 119–125 ✗missed −8
Oct 30 vs POR 75% 113–103 L 105–106 ✗missed −11
Oct 27 at GSW 29% 108–116 W 112–104 ✗missed +16
Oct 26 at DEN 38% 105–109 W 109–104 ✗missed +9
Oct 23 vs PHX 62% 110–106 L 113–116 ✗missed −7
May 3 PO at DAL 34% 103–109 L 101–114 ✓correct −7
May 1 PO vs DAL 59% 107–105 L 93–123 ✗missed −32
Apr 28 PO at DAL 37% 106–110 W 116–111 ✗missed +9
Apr 26 PO at DAL 34% 106–112 L 90–101 ✓correct −5
Apr 23 PO vs DAL 67% 112–106 L 93–96 ✗missed −9
Apr 21 PO vs DAL 63% 112–108 W 109–97 ✓correct +8
Apr 14 vs HOU 65% 112–107 L 105–116 ✗missed −16
Apr 12 vs UTA 76% 116–104 L 109–110 ✗missed −13
Apr 10 vs PHX 49% 109–112 L 108–124 ✓correct −13
Apr 9 at PHX 30% 107–115 W 105–92 ✗missed +21
Apr 7 vs CLE 59% 110–108 W 120–118 ✓correct ±0
Apr 5 vs UTA 79% 114–100 W 131–102 ✓correct +15
Apr 4 vs DEN 57% 110–109 W 102–100 ✓correct +1
Apr 2 at SAC 47% 109–108 L 95–109 ✗missed −15
Mar 31 at CHA 61% 115–107 W 130–118 ✓correct +4
Mar 29 at ORL 47% 110–109 W 100–97 ✓correct +2
Mar 27 at PHI 51% 110–107 W 108–107 ✓correct −2
Mar 25 vs IND 61% 116–113 L 116–133 ✗missed −20
Mar 24 vs PHI 65% 110–105 L 107–121 ✗missed −19
Mar 22 at POR 69% 117–105 W 125–117 ✓correct −4
Mar 20 at POR 63% 115–106 W 116–103 ✓correct +4
Mar 17 vs ATL 65% 111–106 L 93–110 ✗missed −22
Mar 15 at NOP 35% 108–113 L 104–112 ✓correct −3
Mar 14 at CHI 55% 114–109 W 126–111 ✓correct +10
Mar 12 vs MIN 67% 113–107 L 100–118 ✗missed −24
Mar 10 vs MIL 53% 111–112 L 117–124 ✓correct −6
Mar 9 vs CHI 63% 113–109 W 112–102 ✓correct +6
Mar 6 at HOU 53% 116–112 W 122–116 ✓correct +2
Mar 4 at MIL 35% 108–113 L 106–113 ✓correct −2
Mar 3 at MIN 37% 112–116 W 89–88 ✗missed +5
Mar 1 vs WAS 81% 123–108 W 140–115 ✓correct +10
Feb 28 vs LAL 63% 119–115 L 112–116 ✗missed −8
Feb 25 vs SAC 70% 121–113 L 107–123 ✗missed −24
Feb 23 at MEM 51% 117–114 W 101–95 ✓correct +3
Feb 22 at OKC 32% 109–116 L 107–129 ✓correct −15
Feb 14 at GSW 37% 114–118 W 130–125 ✗missed +9
Feb 12 vs MIN 63% 113–109 L 100–121 ✗missed −25
Feb 10 vs DET 84% 127–109 W 112–106 ✓correct −12
Feb 7 vs NOP 65% 117–112 L 106–117 ✗missed −16
Feb 5 at ATL 53% 121–117 W 149–144 ✓correct +1
Feb 4 at MIA 61% 116–108 W 103–95 ✓correct ±0
Feb 2 at DET 57% 121–115 W 136–125 ✓correct +5
Jan 31 at WAS 59% 117–110 W 125–109 ✓correct +9
Jan 29 at CLE 43% 111–112 L 108–118 ✓correct −9
Jan 27 at BOS 43% 110–111 W 115–96 ✗missed +20
Jan 26 at TOR 49% 117–115 W 127–107 ✓correct +18
Jan 23 vs LAL 68% 118–111 W 127–116 ✓correct +4
Jan 21 vs BKN 76% 118–106 W 125–114 ✓correct −1
Jan 16 vs OKC 61% 114–111 W 128–117 ✓correct +8
Jan 14 at MIN 39% 107–110 L 105–109 ✓correct −1
Jan 12 at MEM 59% 115–108 W 128–119 ✓correct +2
Jan 10 vs TOR 67% 119–113 W 126–120 ✓correct ±0
Jan 8 vs PHX 63% 116–112 W 138–111 ✓correct +23
Jan 7 at LAL 57% 117–111 L 103–106 ✗missed −9
Jan 5 at NOP 43% 111–112 W 111–95 ✗missed +17
Jan 3 at PHX 49% 115–113 W 131–122 ✓correct +7
Jan 1 vs MIA 57% 117–116 W 121–104 ✓correct +16
Dec 29 vs MEM 68% 119–112 W 117–106 ✓correct +4
Dec 26 vs CHA 78% 120–107 W 113–104 ✓correct −4
Dec 23 vs BOS 53% 114–115 L 108–145 ✓correct −36
Dec 21 at OKC 35% 112–117 L 115–134 ✓correct −14
Dec 20 at DAL 53% 117–113 W 120–111 ✓correct +5
Dec 18 at IND 51% 119–116 W 151–127 ✓correct +21
Dec 16 vs NYK 59% 113–111 W 144–122 ✓correct +20
Dec 14 vs GSW 67% 118–112 W 121–113 ✓correct +2
Dec 12 vs SAC 67% 118–112 W 119–99 ✓correct +14
Dec 11 vs POR 75% 115–104 W 132–127 ✓correct −6
Dec 8 at UTA 59% 116–109 W 117–103 ✓correct +7
Dec 6 vs DEN 63% 115–111 W 111–102 ✓correct +5
Dec 2 vs GSW 67% 115–109 W 113–112 ✓correct −5
Nov 30 at GSW 43% 114–115 L 114–120 ✓correct −5
Nov 29 at SAC 35% 112–117 W 131–117 ✗missed +19
Nov 27 vs DEN 65% 113–108 L 104–113 ✗missed −14
Nov 25 vs DAL 61% 117–114 W 107–88 ✓correct +16
Nov 24 vs NOP 59% 115–113 L 106–116 ✗missed −12
Nov 22 at SAS 53% 118–114 W 109–102 ✓correct +3
Nov 20 at SAS 55% 118–113 W 124–99 ✓correct +20
Nov 17 vs HOU 59% 113–111 W 106–100 ✓correct +4
Nov 14 at DEN 41% 112–114 L 108–111 ✓correct −1
Nov 12 vs MEM 68% 118–111 L 101–105 ✗missed −11
Nov 10 at DAL 39% 115–118 L 126–144 ✓correct −15
Nov 8 at BKN 47% 115–114 L 93–100 ✗missed −8
Nov 6 at NYK 39% 109–112 L 97–111 ✓correct −11
Nov 1 at LAL 35% 112–117 L 125–130 ✓correct ±0
Oct 31 vs ORL 65% 118–113 W 118–102 ✓correct +11
Oct 29 vs SAS 67% 121–115 W 123–83 ✓correct +34
Oct 27 at UTA 49% 118–116 L 118–120 ✗missed −4
Oct 25 vs POR 68% 120–113 W 123–111 ✓correct +5
Apr 25 PO at PHX 26% 106–116 L 130–136 ✓correct +4
Apr 22 PO vs PHX 63% 114–109 L 100–112 ✗missed −17
Apr 20 PO vs PHX 63% 116–111 L 124–129 ✗missed −10
Apr 18 PO at PHX 30% 112–120 L 109–123 ✓correct −6
Apr 16 PO at PHX 28% 108–117 W 115–110 ✗missed +14
Apr 9 at PHX 42% 112–115 W 119–114 ✗missed +8
Apr 8 vs POR 72% 124–115 W 136–125 ✓correct +2
Apr 5 vs LAL 53% 116–115 W 125–118 ✓correct +6
Apr 1 at NOP 37% 111–116 L 114–122 ✓correct −3
Mar 31 at MEM 37% 110–115 L 94–108 ✓correct −9
Mar 29 at MEM 42% 110–113 W 141–132 ✗missed +12
Mar 27 vs CHI 60% 111–107 W 124–112 ✓correct +8
Mar 25 vs NOP 63% 114–109 L 110–131 ✗missed −26
Mar 23 vs OKC 47% 113–114 W 127–105 ✗missed +23
Mar 21 vs OKC 53% 116–115 L 100–101 ✗missed −2
Mar 19 at POR 70% 125–117 W 117–102 ✓correct +7
Mar 18 vs ORL 55% 118–116 L 108–113 ✗missed −7
Mar 15 vs GSW 55% 117–115 W 134–126 ✓correct +6
Mar 11 vs NYK 58% 119–116 W 106–95 ✓correct +8
Mar 8 vs TOR 45% 115–117 W 108–100 ✗missed +10
Mar 5 vs MEM 53% 116–115 W 135–129 ✓correct +5
Mar 3 at SAC 40% 116–120 L 127–128 ✓correct +3
Mar 2 at GSW 42% 116–119 L 91–115 ✓correct −21
Feb 28 vs MIN 63% 119–114 L 101–108 ✗missed −12
Feb 26 at DEN 37% 110–115 L 124–134 ✓correct −5
Feb 24 vs SAC 55% 116–114 L 175–176 ✗missed −3
Feb 16 at PHX 40% 111–115 W 116–107 ✗missed +13
Feb 14 vs GSW 74% 125–115 W 134–124 ✓correct ±0
Feb 10 vs MIL 63% 119–114 L 106–119 ✗missed −18
Feb 8 vs DAL 58% 110–107 L 104–110 ✗missed −9
Feb 6 at BKN 47% 117–118 W 124–116 ✗missed +9
Feb 4 at NYK 42% 113–116 W 134–128 ✗missed +9
Feb 2 at MIL 37% 113–118 L 105–106 ✓correct +4
Jan 31 at CHI 45% 114–116 W 108–103 ✗missed +7
Jan 29 at CLE 28% 110–119 L 99–122 ✓correct −14
Jan 28 at ATL 35% 112–118 W 120–113 ✗missed +13
Jan 26 vs SAS 78% 123–111 W 138–100 ✓correct +26
Jan 24 at LAL 45% 114–116 W 133–115 ✗missed +20
Jan 22 at DAL 35% 109–115 W 112–98 ✗missed +20
Jan 20 at SAS 65% 122–116 W 131–126 ✓correct −1
Jan 18 at UTA 35% 115–121 L 103–126 ✓correct −17
Jan 17 vs PHI 42% 114–117 L 110–120 ✓correct −7
Jan 15 vs HOU 72% 119–110 W 121–100 ✓correct +12
Jan 13 vs DEN 53% 114–113 L 103–115 ✗missed −13
Jan 10 vs DAL 42% 112–115 W 113–101 ✗missed +15
Jan 8 vs ATL 45% 116–118 L 108–112 ✓correct −2
Jan 6 at MIN 47% 116–117 L 115–128 ✓correct −12
Jan 5 at DEN 42% 112–115 L 91–122 ✓correct −28
Jan 2 vs MIA 47% 110–111 L 100–110 ✓correct −9
Dec 31 at IND 60% 116–112 L 130–131 ✗missed −5
Dec 29 at BOS 37% 112–117 L 110–116 ✓correct −1
Dec 27 at TOR 47% 112–113 W 124–113 ✗missed +12
Dec 26 at DET 68% 116–109 W 142–131 ✓correct +4
Dec 23 at PHI 47% 109–110 L 114–119 ✓correct −4
Dec 21 vs CHA 80% 118–105 W 126–105 ✓correct +8
Dec 17 vs WAS 55% 116–114 W 102–93 ✓correct +7
Dec 15 vs PHX 28% 106–115 L 95–111 ✓correct −7
Dec 14 vs MIN 58% 114–111 W 99–88 ✓correct +8
Dec 12 vs BOS 30% 109–117 W 113–93 ✗missed +28
Dec 10 at WAS 53% 116–115 W 114–107 ✓correct +6
Dec 8 at MIA 32% 106–113 L 110–115 ✓correct +2
Dec 7 at ORL 53% 111–110 L 111–116 ✗missed −6
Dec 5 at CHA 63% 112–107 W 119–117 ✓correct −3
Dec 3 vs SAC 53% 117–116 L 96–123 ✗missed −28
Nov 30 at UTA 42% 112–115 L 112–125 ✓correct −10
Nov 29 at POR 55% 111–109 W 118–112 ✓correct +4
Nov 27 vs IND 53% 113–112 W 114–100 ✓correct +13
Nov 25 vs DEN 47% 108–109 L 104–114 ✓correct −9
Nov 23 at GSW 40% 110–114 L 107–124 ✓correct −13
Nov 21 vs UTA 35% 108–114 W 121–114 ✗missed +13
Nov 19 vs SAS 74% 115–105 W 119–97 ✓correct +12
Nov 17 vs DET 80% 116–103 W 96–91 ✓correct −8
Nov 15 at DAL 42% 106–109 L 101–103 ✓correct +1
Nov 14 at HOU 58% 113–110 W 122–106 ✓correct +13
Nov 12 vs BKN 55% 107–105 L 95–110 ✗missed −17
Nov 9 vs LAL 65% 111–105 W 114–101 ✓correct +7
Nov 7 vs CLE 26% 100–110 W 119–117 ✗missed +12
Nov 6 vs UTA 37% 106–111 L 102–110 ✓correct −3
Nov 4 at SAS 55% 110–108 W 113–106 ✓correct +5
Nov 2 at HOU 68% 113–106 W 109–101 ✓correct +1
Oct 31 vs HOU 63% 113–108 W 95–93 ✓correct −3
Oct 30 vs NOP 45% 110–112 L 91–112 ✓correct −19
Oct 27 at OKC 63% 112–107 L 110–118 ✗missed −13
Oct 25 at OKC 58% 114–111 L 94–108 ✗missed −17
Oct 23 vs PHX 55% 107–105 L 95–112 ✗missed −19
Oct 22 at SAC 65% 116–110 W 111–109 ✓correct −4
Oct 20 at LAL 63% 120–115 W 103–97 ✓correct +1

Surprise games

All LAC surprises

Across every graded season. The percentage is the pregame chance the forecast gave the team that won.

Most unexpected LAC wins

  1. 26%LAC beat CLE119–117Nov 7, 2022-23 · forecast CLE110–100 · missed margin by 12
  2. 28%LAC beat PHX115–110Apr 16, 2022-23 · playoffs · forecast PHX117–108 · missed margin by 14
  3. 29%LAC beat GSW112–104Oct 27, 2024-25 · forecast GSW116–108 · missed margin by 16
  4. 30%LAC beat PHX105–92Apr 9, 2023-24 · forecast PHX115–107 · missed margin by 21
  5. 30%LAC beat BOS113–93Dec 12, 2022-23 · forecast BOS117–109 · missed margin by 28

Most unexpected LAC losses

  1. 14%SAC beat LAC118–109Mar 14, 2025-26 · forecast LAC125–109 · missed margin by 25
  2. 24%UTA beat LAC110–109Apr 12, 2023-24 · forecast LAC116–104 · missed margin by 13
  3. 25%POR beat LAC106–105Oct 30, 2024-25 · forecast LAC113–103 · missed margin by 11
  4. 29%UTA beat LAC129–108Oct 22, 2025-26 · forecast LAC119–111 · missed margin by 29
  5. 30%SAC beat LAC123–107Feb 25, 2023-24 · forecast LAC121–113 · missed margin by 24

Largest margin misses

  1. 77%LAC beat BKN126–67Jan 15, 2024-25 · forecast LAC116–105 · missed margin by 48
  2. 46%SAS beat LAC122–86Dec 31, 2024-25 · forecast LAC114–112 · missed margin by 38
  3. 47%BOS beat LAC145–108Dec 23, 2023-24 · forecast BOS115–114 · missed margin by 36
  4. 67%LAC beat SAS123–83Oct 29, 2023-24 · forecast LAC121–115 · missed margin by 34
  5. 36%MIN beat LAC108–80Dec 4, 2024-25 · forecast LAC109–104 · missed margin by 33

Recent results the forecast got wrong

  1. 47%GSW beat LAC124–112Nov 1, 2026-27 · forecast LAC113–112 · missed margin by 13
  2. 39%LAL beat LAC103–87Oct 28, 2026-27 · forecast LAC115–111 · missed margin by 20
  3. 39%POR beat LAC114–104Mar 31, 2025-26 · forecast LAC116–112 · missed margin by 14
  4. 47%NOP beat LAC105–99Mar 19, 2025-26 · forecast LAC118–117 · missed margin by 7
  5. 44%NOP beat LAC124–109Mar 18, 2025-26 · forecast LAC120–118 · missed margin by 17

Definitions

Expected wins
The sum of the team's pregame win probabilities over the games in the sample (home: the stored home win probability; road: one minus it).
Wins vs expectation
Actual wins minus expected wins. It describes results relative to the forecasts, not why they differed.
Margin error
The team's actual margin minus its forecast margin, in points. Positive means the team did better than forecast.
Error variability
The sample standard deviation of margin errors. Higher means the forecasts for this team's games were less consistent.
Winner picked
The share of the team's games in which the forecast winner won, whichever team that was. Teams play different mixes of close and lopsided games, so this alone is not a fair measure of how hard a team is to forecast.
Average margin miss
The mean absolute margin error. This is the headline measure of how hard a team's games were for this model to forecast.
Average margin error
The mean signed margin error. Consistently positive means the model underrated the team in this sample; negative, overrated.
Brier score
The mean squared difference between the team's pregame win probability and the result (1 for a win, 0 for a loss). It rewards confident correct forecasts and penalises confident wrong ones.
Intervals and samples
Ranges are 90% bootstrap intervals (1,000 resamples of the team's games). Under 20 games no ranking is shown; 20 to 59 games is exploratory; 60 or more is roughly a full season.

More on how forecasts are made and tested: Methodology.