2025-26 · Regular Season · Final
Portland Trail Blazers at Los Angeles Clippers
Tuesday, March 31, 2026 · tip-off 11:00 PM ET
POR 1–4@LAC 0–4 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| POR Portland Trail Blazers | 112 | 114 | +2 |
| LAC Los Angeles Clippers (home) | 116 | 104 | −12 |
Forecast: Los Angeles Clippers to win, 61% win probability, projected margin 4.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | POR | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1492 | 1569 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +147 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −0.8 | +1.5 |
| Games played this season | 76 | 75 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 114.3 | 118.5 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 103.0 | 112.8 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 100.4 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 16.0 | 8.9 |
| Rest days | 2 | 2 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingPOR1492LAC1569
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
POR1492
- Ended last season at 1504 → started this one at 1503
- First 66 games: −35.2
- Last 10 games: +24.4
- WUTA124–114+3.8
- L@PHI103–109−5.6
- W@BKN114–95+11.2
- W@IND127–119+5.4
- W@MIN108–104+9.9
- L@DEN112–128−7.0
- WBKN134–99+7.2
- WMIL130–99+9.1
- LDAL93–100−16.0
- WWAS123–88+6.4
LAC1569
- Ended last season at 1636 → started this one at 1602
- First 65 games: −17.9
- Last 10 games: −15.1
- WCHI119–108+3.1
- LSAC109–118−23.5
- LSAS115–119−4.8
- L@NOP109–124−16.5
- L@NOP99–105−8.5
- W@DAL138–131+5.6
- WMIL129–96+7.7
- WTOR119–94+13.4
- W@IND114–113+1.6
- W@MIL127–113+6.8
Season scoring marginPOR−0.8LAC+1.5
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
POR−0.8
Scores 115.3, allows 116.1 over 76 games: −0.8 a game.
LAC+1.5
Scores 114.0, allows 112.5 over 75 games: +1.5 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10POR114.3LAC118.5
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26 to date: 114.6).
POR114.3scored, −0.4 vs league
| Factor | POR | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 55.2% | 54.6% | +1.0 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 15.3% | 12.2% | −4.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 36.3% | 26.0% | +4.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.239 | 0.210 | +0.8 | |
| Everything else | −2.4 |
LAC118.5scored, +3.8 vs league
| Factor | LAC | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.2% | 54.6% | +5.5 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.3% | 12.2% | +1.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 23.8% | 26.0% | −0.9 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.214 | 0.210 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | −2.1 |
Defensive rating, last 10POR103.0LAC112.8
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26 to date: 114.6).
POR103.0allowed, −11.7 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 49.4% | 54.6% | +7.8 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.3% | 12.2% | +1.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 19.2% | 26.0% | +3.0 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.205 | 0.210 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | −0.8 |
LAC112.8allowed, −1.8 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 56.4% | 54.6% | −2.8 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.9% | 12.2% | +3.8 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.7% | 26.0% | −0.8 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.159 | 0.210 | +1.5 | |
| Everything else | +0.1 |
Pace, last 10average 100.4
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
POR 102.5 and LAC 98.3 → average 100.4 (league 2025-26 to date: 100.2)
Rotation points missingPOR16.0LAC8.9
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
POR16.0pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jerami Grant | 16.0 | 29.4 | 7 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-03-31 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
LAC8.9pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isaiah Jackson | 8.9 | 18.3 | 9 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-03-31 17:30 ET. 11 rotation players.
RestPOR2 daysLAC2 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
POR2days
Last played Mar 29 against WAS.
LAC2days
Last played Mar 29 against MIL.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
POR
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29 | WAS | 123–88 | 44-86 | 12-36 | 23-32 | 14 | 11 | 119.4 | 85.4 | 103.0 |
| Mar 27 | DAL | 93–100 | 31-79 | 8-30 | 23-33 | 24 | 14 | 89.4 | 96.2 | 104.0 |
| Mar 25 | MIL | 130–99 | 42-80 | 19-41 | 27-33 | 20 | 15 | 131.3 | 98.0 | 100.0 |
| Mar 23 | BKN | 134–99 | 44-80 | 18-38 | 28-40 | 22 | 8 | 125.2 | 91.7 | 107.5 |
| Mar 22 | @DEN | 112–128 | 42-97 | 16-50 | 12-16 | 10 | 14 | 109.8 | 126.7 | 101.5 |
| Mar 20 | @MIN | 108–104 | 39-92 | 9-37 | 21-24 | 17 | 18 | 108.0 | 104.0 | 100.0 |
| Mar 18 | @IND | 127–119 | 45-101 | 16-46 | 21-26 | 13 | 22 | 128.3 | 121.4 | 98.5 |
| Mar 16 | @BKN | 114–95 | 41-80 | 11-26 | 21-29 | 18 | 11 | 115.2 | 95.0 | 99.5 |
| Mar 15 | @PHI | 103–109 | 36-92 | 17-53 | 14-21 | 18 | 15 | 100.0 | 103.8 | 104.0 |
| Mar 13 | UTA | 124–114 | 46-89 | 17-46 | 15-16 | 24 | 14 | 115.9 | 107.5 | 106.5 |
LAC
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29 | @MIL | 127–113 | 45-77 | 13-30 | 24-28 | 16 | 7 | 125.7 | 111.9 | 101.0 |
| Mar 27 | @IND | 114–113 | 41-96 | 13-34 | 19-27 | 11 | 16 | 115.2 | 111.9 | 100.0 |
| Mar 25 | TOR | 119–94 | 42-82 | 16-35 | 19-24 | 10 | 10 | 125.3 | 98.9 | 95.0 |
| Mar 23 | MIL | 129–96 | 47-81 | 17-38 | 18-18 | 12 | 4 | 133.0 | 99.0 | 97.0 |
| Mar 21 | @DAL | 138–131 | 51-90 | 21-42 | 15-18 | 11 | 6 | 130.2 | 124.8 | 95.5 |
| Mar 19 | @NOP | 99–105 | 35-76 | 10-32 | 19-32 | 15 | 9 | 102.1 | 107.1 | 97.5 |
| Mar 18 | @NOP | 109–124 | 45-88 | 9-31 | 10-13 | 15 | 14 | 113.5 | 130.5 | 95.5 |
| Mar 16 | SAS | 115–119 | 43-89 | 11-29 | 18-24 | 13 | 12 | 116.2 | 121.4 | 98.5 |
| Mar 14 | SAC | 109–118 | 39-84 | 9-27 | 22-29 | 13 | 9 | 106.9 | 116.8 | 101.5 |
| Mar 13 | CHI | 119–108 | 46-96 | 9-32 | 18-24 | 6 | 10 | 116.7 | 105.9 | 102.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2025-26 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | POR | LAC |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 114 | 104 |
| Field goals | 41–91 · 45.1% | 38–76 · 50.0% |
| Three-pointers | 15–45 · 33.3% | 10–30 · 33.3% |
| Free throws | 17–18 · 94.4% | 18–23 · 78.3% |
| Rebounds | 48 | 30 |
| Assists | 22 | 19 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 14 |
| Steals | 8 | 8 |
| Blocks | 4 | 9 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Portland Trail Blazers · Los Angeles Clippers
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (LAC) | +4 | −10 | −14 |
| Total points | 228 | 218 | −10 |
| POR points | 112 | 114 | +2 |
| LAC points | 116 | 104 | −12 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 26 2025-26 | LAC at POR | LAC 119 – 103 POR |
| Oct 26 2025-26 | POR at LAC | POR 107 – 114 LAC |
| Jan 16 2024-25 | LAC at POR | LAC 118 – 89 POR |
| Dec 3 2024-25 | POR at LAC | POR 105 – 127 LAC |
| Oct 30 2024-25 | POR at LAC | POR 106 – 105 LAC |