2022-23 · Regular Season · Final
Portland Trail Blazers at Utah Jazz
Saturday, December 3, 2022 · tip-off time not recorded
POR 4–0@UTA 0–1 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| POR Portland Trail Blazers | 111 | 116 | +5 |
| UTA Utah Jazz (home) | 122 | 111 | −11 |
Forecast: Utah Jazz to win, 76% win probability, projected margin 11.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | POR | UTA |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1393 | 1531 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +208 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −1.7 | +2.4 |
| Games played this season | 22 | 25 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 112.8 | 118.6 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 119.8 | 118.7 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 99.0 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 35.7 | 7.7 |
| Rest days | 3 | 1 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | Yes |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingPOR1393UTA1531
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
POR1393
- Ended last season at 1249 → started this one at 1312
- First 12 games: +110.8
- Last 10 games: −29.4
- L@DAL112–117−2.6
- WSAS117–110+7.3
- LBKN107–109−4.9
- LUTA113–118−5.4
- L@MIL111–119−3.4
- L@CLE96–114−5.6
- W@NYK132–129+9.2
- L@BKN97–111−6.3
- LLAC112–118−7.3
- L@LAL109–128−10.4
UTA1531
- Ended last season at 1551 → started this one at 1538
- First 15 games: +30.9
- Last 10 games: −37.6
- LNYK111–118−13.7
- WPHX134–133+3.6
- W@POR118–113+5.4
- L@LAC114–121−8.3
- LDET116–125−20.5
- L@GSW118–129−7.3
- L@PHX112–113−2.2
- LCHI107–114−12.4
- WLAC125–112+8.8
- WIND139–119+9.0
Season scoring marginPOR−1.7UTA+2.4
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
POR−1.7
Scores 109.8, allows 111.5 over 22 games: −1.7 a game.
UTA+2.4
Scores 117.9, allows 115.5 over 25 games: +2.4 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10POR112.8UTA118.6
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2022-23 to date: 112.2).
POR112.8scored, +0.6 vs league
| Factor | POR | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.4% | 54.0% | −0.9 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.0% | 12.7% | +1.0 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 24.7% | 23.9% | +0.4 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.237 | 0.209 | +0.8 | |
| Everything else | −0.7 |
UTA118.6scored, +6.4 vs league
| Factor | UTA | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 58.2% | 54.0% | +6.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 14.3% | 12.7% | −2.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.2% | 23.9% | +1.5 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.225 | 0.209 | +0.5 | |
| Everything else | +0.3 |
Defensive rating, last 10POR119.8UTA118.7
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2022-23 to date: 112.2).
POR119.8allowed, +7.6 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.3% | 54.0% | −5.0 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.7% | 12.7% | −1.4 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 23.9% | 23.9% | +0.0 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.217 | 0.209 | −0.2 | |
| Everything else | −0.9 |
UTA118.7allowed, +6.5 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.3% | 54.0% | +1.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.8% | 12.7% | −2.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 28.7% | 23.9% | −2.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.235 | 0.209 | −0.8 | |
| Everything else | −2.0 |
Pace, last 10average 99.0
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
POR 97.0 and UTA 100.9 → average 99.0 (league 2022-23 to date: 100.0)
Rotation points missingPOR35.7UTA7.7
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
POR35.7pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Damian Lillard | 22.2 | 35.4 | 4 |
| Josh Hart | 9.7 | 34.8 | 9 |
| Nassir Little | 3.8 | 15.2 | 9 |
Source: official injury report, 2022-12-03 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
UTA7.7pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Conley | 7.7 | 24.4 | 3 |
Source: official injury report, 2022-12-03 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
RestPOR3 daysUTA1 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
POR3days
Last played Nov 30 against LAL.
UTA1day, back-to-back
Last played Dec 2 against IND.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
POR
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30 | @LAL | 109–128 | 42-90 | 8-24 | 17-21 | 10 | 12 | 110.1 | 129.3 | 99.0 |
| Nov 29 | LAC | 112–118 | 42-90 | 17-35 | 11-15 | 11 | 9 | 116.7 | 122.9 | 96.0 |
| Nov 27 | @BKN | 97–111 | 35-79 | 12-33 | 15-22 | 13 | 11 | 107.8 | 123.3 | 90.0 |
| Nov 25 | @NYK | 132–129 | 42-85 | 10-32 | 38-51 | 12 | 13 | 120.0 | 118.3 | 99.2 |
| Nov 23 | @CLE | 96–114 | 35-78 | 13-31 | 13-13 | 16 | 11 | 106.7 | 128.1 | 89.5 |
| Nov 21 | @MIL | 111–119 | 44-93 | 8-29 | 15-19 | 15 | 12 | 108.8 | 114.4 | 103.0 |
| Nov 19 | UTA | 113–118 | 39-83 | 13-42 | 22-27 | 17 | 10 | 111.9 | 116.8 | 101.0 |
| Nov 17 | BKN | 107–109 | 36-93 | 13-36 | 22-27 | 9 | 8 | 107.0 | 109.0 | 100.0 |
| Nov 15 | SAS | 117–110 | 41-79 | 15-32 | 20-26 | 15 | 9 | 120.6 | 112.2 | 97.5 |
| Nov 12 | @DAL | 112–117 | 36-80 | 13-31 | 27-35 | 12 | 12 | 117.9 | 123.2 | 95.0 |
UTA
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2 | IND | 139–119 | 46-83 | 15-34 | 32-37 | 24 | 8 | 120.9 | 102.6 | 115.5 |
| Nov 30 | LAC | 125–112 | 45-81 | 14-32 | 21-28 | 18 | 13 | 127.6 | 115.5 | 97.5 |
| Nov 28 | CHI | 107–114 | 41-85 | 19-49 | 6-15 | 14 | 9 | 111.5 | 115.2 | 97.5 |
| Nov 26 | @PHX | 112–113 | 40-79 | 13-32 | 19-25 | 12 | 8 | 119.1 | 120.2 | 94.0 |
| Nov 25 | @GSW | 118–129 | 46-97 | 11-45 | 15-17 | 13 | 15 | 114.6 | 124.0 | 103.5 |
| Nov 23 | DET | 116–125 | 41-83 | 18-41 | 16-19 | 15 | 7 | 120.8 | 131.6 | 95.5 |
| Nov 21 | @LAC | 114–121 | 40-89 | 12-38 | 22-24 | 17 | 16 | 115.2 | 123.5 | 98.5 |
| Nov 19 | @POR | 118–113 | 42-91 | 14-39 | 20-23 | 13 | 11 | 116.8 | 111.9 | 101.0 |
| Nov 18 | PHX | 134–133 | 51-91 | 16-31 | 16-24 | 16 | 11 | 131.4 | 127.9 | 103.0 |
| Nov 15 | NYK | 111–118 | 36-83 | 14-43 | 25-30 | 20 | 15 | 107.8 | 114.6 | 103.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2022-23 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | POR | UTA |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 116 | 111 |
| Field goals | 41–85 · 48.2% | 38–84 · 45.2% |
| Three-pointers | 10–25 · 40.0% | 13–36 · 36.1% |
| Free throws | 24–31 · 77.4% | 22–28 · 78.6% |
| Rebounds | 49 | 44 |
| Assists | 19 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 13 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Portland Trail Blazers · Utah Jazz
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (UTA) | +11 | −5 | −16 |
| Total points | 233 | 227 | −6 |
| POR points | 111 | 116 | +5 |
| UTA points | 122 | 111 | −11 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 19 2022-23 | UTA at POR | UTA 118 – 113 POR |
| Apr 10 2021-22 | UTA at POR | UTA 111 – 80 POR |
| Mar 9 2021-22 | POR at UTA | POR 85 – 123 UTA |
| Dec 29 2021-22 | UTA at POR | UTA 120 – 105 POR |
| Nov 29 2021-22 | POR at UTA | POR 107 – 129 UTA |