2026-27 · Regular Season · Final
Memphis Grizzlies at Portland Trail Blazers
Thursday, October 29, 2026 · tip-off 10:00 PM ET
MEM 4–0@POR 3–0 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MEM Memphis Grizzlies | 112 | 124 | +12 |
| POR Portland Trail Blazers (home) | 122 | 103 | −19 |
Forecast: Portland Trail Blazers to win, 76% win probability, projected margin 10.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhy the model leans POR
- Home court+2.1 PORWhat the model gives the home team on an average night.
- Team strength+5.2 PORElo POR 1551, MEM 1374; season margin POR +2.0, MEM −3.0.
- Recent form+3.1 PORLast 10 games, per 100 possessions: POR scores 113.7 and allows 112.6; MEM scores 109.1 and allows 120.3.
- Player availability+0.5 MEMPOR without Robert Williams III (10 ppg).
Together: POR by 10, a 76% chance. Smaller inputs make up the rest; the chart below has all of them.
Team-by-team notes from the box scores
POR is 3–0, winning by 19 a game on average (scoring 129, allowing 111). Last season they were a −1 team, which still counts for 85% of their season margin. Their offense shoots 52% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 3 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: ball security +1.4, offensive rebounding +1.3. Their defense forces turnovers on 13.2% of opponent possessions (league 12.2%), which alone adds about 1.4 points per 100 possessions. Robert Williams III (10 ppg) is out.
MEM is 4–0, winning by 10 a game on average (scoring 117, allowing 107). Last season they were a −6 team, which still counts for 80% of their season margin. Their offense shoots 52% eFG against a 55% league average, which alone costs about 4 points per 100 possessions. Their offense is below average at everything: shooting, turnovers, rebounding and free throws. Their defense lets opponents rebound 42% of their misses (league 26%), which alone costs about 7 points per 100 possessions. Smaller factors: shooting defense −5.
Written from the numbers in Built from the box scores, using only values that rebuild exactly.
How the projected margin was built
Points of home margin. Right of zero favors POR; left favors MEM.
Every input the model received, with its effect
| Input | MEM | POR | Effect, pts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1374 | 1551 | +0.7 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +247 | +4.5 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | −3.0 | +2.0 | +0.6 |
| Games played this season | 4 | 3 | −0.7 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 109.1 | 113.7 | +0.9 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 120.3 | 112.6 | +2.2 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 100.9 | +0.0 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 0.0 | 9.7 | −0.5 |
| Rest days | 3 | 2 | +0.0 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No | +0.0 |
All 21 raw inputs, in points for each team
| Input | Value | POR pts | MEM pts | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elo gap incl. home court | 247.4 | +1.87 | −2.67 | +4.54 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (away) | 120.3 | +1.54 | +0.17 | +1.37 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (away) | 109.1 | −0.03 | −1.14 | +1.11 |
| Rotation points missing (away) | 0.0 | −0.38 | +0.53 | −0.91 |
| Defensive rating, last 10 (home) | 112.6 | −0.49 | −1.28 | +0.79 |
| Games played (away) | 4.0 | +0.24 | +0.96 | −0.72 |
| Season scoring margin (away) | -3.0 | +0.45 | −0.03 | +0.48 |
| Elo rating (away) | 1373.6 | +0.34 | −0.08 | +0.42 |
| Rotation points missing (home) | 9.7 | +0.52 | +0.10 | +0.41 |
| Elo rating (home) | 1551.0 | +0.03 | −0.26 | +0.28 |
| Home series wins | 0.0 | +0.26 | +0.02 | +0.23 |
| Offensive rating, last 10 (home) | 113.7 | −0.28 | −0.11 | −0.17 |
| Season scoring margin (home) | 2.0 | +0.20 | +0.06 | +0.14 |
| Games played (home) | 3.0 | +0.42 | +0.37 | +0.05 |
| Combined pace, last 10 | 100.9 | +2.95 | +2.92 | +0.03 |
| Back-to-back (home) | 0 | +0.01 | −0.01 | +0.02 |
| Rest days (away) | 3.0 | +0.02 | +0.00 | +0.01 |
| Series pressure | 0.0 | +0.03 | +0.01 | +0.01 |
| Rest days (home) | 2.0 | +0.04 | +0.05 | −0.01 |
| Elimination game | 0 | ±0.00 | −0.00 | +0.00 |
| Back-to-back (away) | 0 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 | ±0.00 |
| Baseline (average output) | 114.4 | 112.4 | +2.10 |
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMEM1374POR15515.2 pts toward POR
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MEM1374
- Ended last season at 1273 → started this one at 1330
- This season's 4 games: +44.0
- WUTA123–103+12.8
- W@GSW111–108+9.2
- W@SAC123–112+14.2
- W@UTA110–105+7.8
POR1551
- Ended last season at 1514 → started this one at 1511
- This season's 3 games: +40.2
- WPHX124–83+22.0
- W@SAC128–120+6.0
- W@LAL136–129+12.2
Season scoring marginMEM−3.0POR+2.00.1 pts toward MEM
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MEM−3.0
Scores 116.8, allows 107.0 over 4 games: +9.8 a game.
20% this season (+9.8) + 80% last season (−6.1) = −3.0
POR+2.0
Scores 129.3, allows 110.7 over 3 games: +18.7 a game.
15% this season (+18.7) + 85% last season (−1.0) = +2.0
Offensive rating, last 10MEM109.1POR113.70.9 pts toward POR
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
MEM109.1scored, −5.5 vs league
| Factor | MEM | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.1% | 54.5% | −3.7 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.5% | 12.2% | −0.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 20.3% | 26.1% | −2.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.177 | 0.210 | −0.9 | |
| Everything else | +2.2 |
POR113.7scored, −0.9 vs league
| Factor | POR | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.4% | 54.5% | −3.1 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.2% | 12.2% | +1.4 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 29.0% | 26.1% | +1.3 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.215 | 0.210 | +0.1 | |
| Everything else | −0.5 |
Defensive rating, last 10MEM120.3POR112.62.2 pts toward POR
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2025-26: 114.6).
MEM120.3allowed, +5.7 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 57.7% | 54.5% | −4.8 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 12.7% | 12.2% | +0.7 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 42.2% | 26.1% | −7.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.226 | 0.210 | −0.5 | |
| Everything else | +6.1 |
POR112.6allowed, −2.0 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 54.2% | 54.5% | +0.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 13.2% | 12.2% | +1.4 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 25.6% | 26.1% | +0.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.231 | 0.210 | −0.6 | |
| Everything else | +0.4 |
Pace, last 10average 100.9no effect on the margin
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MEM 103.5 and POR 98.3 → average 100.9 (league 2025-26: 100.0)
Rotation points missingMEM0.0POR9.70.5 pts toward MEM
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MEM0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-29 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
POR9.7pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Williams III | 9.7 | 18.1 | 3 |
Source: official injury report, 2026-10-29 17:30 ET. 9 rotation players.
RestMEM3 daysPOR2 daysno effect on the margin
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MEM3days
Last played Oct 26 against UTA.
POR2days
Last played Oct 27 against LAL.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MEM
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26 | @UTA | 110–105 | 37-85 | 16-37 | 20-22 | 12 | 6 | 110.0 | 104.0 | 100.5 |
| Oct 25 | @SAC | 123–112 | 42-96 | 15-41 | 24-27 | 12 | 19 | 121.8 | 113.1 | 100.0 |
| Oct 23 | @GSW | 111–108 | 40-86 | 15-39 | 16-22 | 25 | 18 | 112.1 | 108.0 | 99.5 |
| Oct 21 | UTA | 123–103 | 44-93 | 13-34 | 22-28 | 13 | 15 | 118.3 | 99.0 | 104.0 |
| Apr 12 | @HOU | 101–132 | 39-95 | 13-49 | 10-10 | 13 | 3 | 98.1 | 128.2 | 103.0 |
| Apr 10 | @UTA | 101–147 | 41-109 | 11-52 | 8-9 | 19 | 4 | 83.5 | 121.5 | 121.0 |
| Apr 8 | @DEN | 119–136 | 42-92 | 19-50 | 16-23 | 6 | 3 | 119.0 | 136.0 | 100.0 |
| Apr 6 | CLE | 126–142 | 45-94 | 29-59 | 7-10 | 13 | 3 | 122.3 | 137.9 | 103.0 |
| Apr 5 | @MIL | 115–131 | 38-92 | 17-46 | 22-28 | 14 | 9 | 112.7 | 129.7 | 101.5 |
| Apr 3 | TOR | 96–128 | 34-85 | 11-42 | 17-26 | 20 | 8 | 93.2 | 125.5 | 102.5 |
POR
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27 | @LAL | 136–129 | 46-78 | 18-36 | 26-41 | 14 | 7 | 133.3 | 129.0 | 101.0 |
| Oct 23 | @SAC | 128–120 | 46-96 | 14-48 | 22-30 | 9 | 13 | 120.8 | 113.2 | 106.0 |
| Oct 21 | PHX | 124–83 | 45-94 | 19-47 | 15-18 | 17 | 16 | 126.5 | 86.5 | 97.0 |
| Apr 28 | @SAS | 95–114 | 33-94 | 11-47 | 18-23 | 9 | 14 | 99.0 | 121.3 | 95.0 |
| Apr 26 | SAS | 93–114 | 32-80 | 10-31 | 19-23 | 18 | 7 | 93.0 | 116.3 | 99.0 |
| Apr 24 | SAS | 108–120 | 37-90 | 14-38 | 20-29 | 10 | 16 | 109.1 | 122.4 | 98.5 |
| Apr 21 | @SAS | 106–103 | 38-89 | 13-38 | 17-23 | 15 | 15 | 108.2 | 106.2 | 97.5 |
| Apr 19 | @SAS | 98–111 | 39-91 | 10-38 | 10-12 | 10 | 8 | 102.1 | 116.8 | 95.5 |
| Apr 12 | SAC | 122–110 | 47-101 | 16-46 | 12-15 | 12 | 18 | 123.2 | 112.2 | 98.5 |
| Apr 10 | LAC | 116–97 | 37-83 | 12-39 | 30-35 | 13 | 14 | 122.1 | 102.1 | 95.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2026-27 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MEM | POR |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 124 | 103 |
| Field goals | 47–102 · 46.1% | 37–91 · 40.7% |
| Three-pointers | 18–42 · 42.9% | 12–49 · 24.5% |
| Free throws | 12–12 · 100.0% | 17–26 · 65.4% |
| Rebounds | 54 | 45 |
| Assists | 32 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 16 |
| Steals | 7 | 5 |
| Blocks | 1 | 11 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Memphis Grizzlies · Portland Trail Blazers
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (POR) | +10 | −21 | −31 |
| Total points | 234 | 227 | −7 |
| MEM points | 112 | 124 | +12 |
| POR points | 122 | 103 | −19 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4 2025-26 | POR at MEM | POR 122 – 114 MEM |
| Feb 7 2025-26 | MEM at POR | MEM 115 – 122 POR |
| Feb 6 2025-26 | MEM at POR | MEM 115 – 135 POR |
| Dec 7 2025-26 | POR at MEM | POR 96 – 119 MEM |
| Mar 19 2024-25 | MEM at POR | MEM 99 – 115 POR |