2023-24 · Regular Season · Final
Milwaukee Bucks at Cleveland Cavaliers
Wednesday, January 17, 2024 · tip-off time not recorded
MIL 1–0@CLE 1–1 records going into the game NBA.com recap ↗
Forecast and result
| Team | Projected | Final | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MIL Milwaukee Bucks | 112 | 95 | −17 |
| CLE Cleveland Cavaliers (home) | 116 | 135 | +19 |
Forecast: Cleveland Cavaliers to win, 63% win probability, projected margin 4.
Inside the Forecast
How the inputs are builtWhat the model received
| Input | MIL | CLE |
|---|---|---|
| Elo ratingMargin-of-victory Elo; 1500 is average. | 1612 | 1560 |
| Elo gap, home minus road, incl. home court | +18 | |
| Season scoring marginPoints per game, blended with last season early in the year. | +5.0 | +2.3 |
| Games played this season | 40 | 38 |
| Offensive rating, last 10Points scored per 100 possessions. | 123.0 | 117.3 |
| Defensive rating, last 10Points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better. | 118.9 | 109.0 |
| Combined pace, last 10Possessions per game, both teams. | 99.9 | |
| Rotation points missingPoints per game of rotation players listed Out or Doubtful. | 32.3 | 0.0 |
| Rest days | 3 | 2 |
| Second night of a back-to-back | No | No |
This forecast can't be broken down exactly: the model version that made this forecast is not available. Explanations are shown only when the model that made a forecast can be rebuilt and reproduces it. How explanations are checked
Built from the box scores
How the breakdowns workWhere each input came from. Open a row to see the games and box-score stats behind it. A breakdown is shown only when rebuilding it from the stored stats gives exactly the number the model received.
Elo ratingMIL1612CLE1560
Updated after every game from the final score only: wins, losses and margin. Each season starts by keeping 75% of last season's distance from the 1500 average.
MIL1612
- Ended last season at 1556 → started this one at 1542
- First 30 games: +71.0
- Last 10 games: −1.3
- W@BKN144–122+14.2
- W@CLE119–111+8.7
- LIND113–122−17.8
- L@IND130–142−12.9
- W@SAS125–121+2.0
- L@HOU108–112−8.0
- LUTA116–132−25.0
- WBOS135–102+30.7
- WGSW129–118+4.8
- WSAC143–142+2.0
CLE1560
- Ended last season at 1565 → started this one at 1549
- First 28 games: −3.3
- Last 10 games: +14.1
- LNOP104–123−19.6
- W@CHI109–95+15.1
- W@DAL113–110+6.1
- LMIL111–119−8.7
- L@TOR121–124−5.8
- WWAS140–101+7.8
- WWAS114–90+5.0
- WSAS117–115+1.0
- WBKN111–102+4.6
- WCHI109–91+8.6
Season scoring marginMIL+5.0CLE+2.3
Points scored minus points allowed per game this season, mixed with last season's margin until 20 games are played.
MIL+5.0
Scores 125.0, allows 119.9 over 40 games: +5.0 a game.
CLE+2.3
Scores 113.1, allows 110.7 over 38 games: +2.3 a game.
Offensive rating, last 10MIL123.0CLE117.3
Points scored per 100 possessions. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.1).
MIL123.0scored, +7.8 vs league
| Factor | MIL | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 59.3% | 54.7% | +7.0 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 10.6% | 11.7% | +1.5 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 19.9% | 24.5% | −2.1 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.228 | 0.205 | +0.7 | |
| Everything else | +0.8 |
CLE117.3scored, +2.2 vs league
| Factor | CLE | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 55.0% | 54.7% | +0.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.2% | 11.7% | +0.6 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 27.3% | 24.5% | +1.2 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.180 | 0.205 | −0.7 | |
| Everything else | +0.7 |
Defensive rating, last 10MIL118.9CLE109.0
Points allowed per 100 possessions, built from what opponents did in those games. Bars point right when the defense held opponents below average. Split into the four factors: right of center helps the team, left hurts, in points per 100 possessions compared with the league average (2023-24 to date: 115.1).
MIL118.9allowed, +3.8 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 53.8% | 54.7% | +1.4 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 7.6% | 11.7% | −5.8 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 22.9% | 24.5% | +0.7 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.214 | 0.205 | −0.3 | |
| Everything else | +0.0 |
CLE109.0allowed, −6.2 vs league
| Factor | Opponents | League | hurtshelps | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shooting (eFG%) | 52.3% | 54.7% | +3.6 | |
| Turnovers (TOV%) | 11.8% | 11.7% | +0.3 | |
| Offensive rebounding (OREB%) | 16.4% | 24.5% | +3.6 | |
| Free throws (FTM per FGA) | 0.206 | 0.205 | −0.0 | |
| Everything else | −1.3 |
Pace, last 10average 99.9
Possessions per 48 minutes. The model uses the average of the two teams. Faster games mean more points for both sides, so pace mostly moves the projected total, not the margin.
MIL 101.7 and CLE 98.1 → average 99.9 (league 2023-24 to date: 99.9)
Rotation points missingMIL32.3CLE0.0
Points per game of rotation players (two or more of the last 10 games this season, 15+ minutes) listed Out or Doubtful on the official injury report.
MIL32.3pts/g missing
| Player | Pts | Min | Games |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giannis Antetokounmpo | 32.3 | 35.9 | 10 |
Source: official injury report, 2024-01-17 17:30 ET. 8 rotation players.
CLE0.0pts/g missing
Every rotation player was available.
Source: official injury report, 2024-01-17 17:30 ET. 10 rotation players.
RestMIL3 daysCLE2 days
Days since the team's previous game, capped at 5. One day means the second night of a back-to-back.
MIL3days
Last played Jan 14 against SAC.
CLE2days
Last played Jan 15 against CHI.
The last 10 games behind these numbers, box-score totals
MIL
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14 | SAC | 143–142 | 48-92 | 20-43 | 27-32 | 13 | 4 | 126.5 | 124.6 | 102.8 |
| Jan 13 | GSW | 129–118 | 51-94 | 13-31 | 14-17 | 12 | 14 | 131.6 | 119.2 | 98.5 |
| Jan 11 | BOS | 135–102 | 52-92 | 18-42 | 13-16 | 9 | 11 | 137.8 | 103.0 | 98.5 |
| Jan 8 | UTA | 116–132 | 42-94 | 17-36 | 15-19 | 9 | 10 | 116.0 | 134.7 | 99.0 |
| Jan 6 | @HOU | 108–112 | 35-76 | 9-34 | 29-42 | 11 | 3 | 106.9 | 112.0 | 100.5 |
| Jan 4 | @SAS | 125–121 | 49-92 | 12-34 | 15-19 | 14 | 6 | 120.2 | 116.3 | 104.0 |
| Jan 3 | @IND | 130–142 | 46-92 | 14-37 | 24-32 | 13 | 9 | 122.6 | 132.7 | 106.5 |
| Jan 1 | IND | 113–122 | 41-93 | 10-40 | 21-26 | 11 | 7 | 108.7 | 117.3 | 104.0 |
| Dec 29 | @CLE | 119–111 | 41-80 | 12-29 | 25-28 | 17 | 6 | 116.7 | 108.8 | 102.0 |
| Dec 27 | @BKN | 144–122 | 52-89 | 23-51 | 17-23 | 10 | 8 | 142.6 | 120.8 | 101.0 |
CLE
| Date | Opp | Score | FG | 3P | FT | TOV | OREB | Off | Def | Pace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15 | CHI | 109–91 | 39-95 | 20-57 | 11-11 | 11 | 13 | 110.1 | 91.9 | 99.0 |
| Jan 11 | BKN | 111–102 | 32-82 | 13-44 | 34-43 | 11 | 11 | 109.9 | 102.0 | 100.5 |
| Jan 7 | SAS | 117–115 | 43-88 | 16-43 | 15-21 | 16 | 10 | 119.4 | 117.3 | 98.0 |
| Jan 5 | WAS | 114–90 | 41-77 | 16-33 | 16-23 | 23 | 10 | 117.5 | 91.8 | 97.5 |
| Jan 3 | WAS | 140–101 | 54-101 | 20-42 | 12-16 | 8 | 15 | 144.3 | 105.2 | 96.5 |
| Jan 1 | @TOR | 121–124 | 43-89 | 12-36 | 23-26 | 9 | 4 | 118.6 | 121.6 | 102.0 |
| Dec 29 | MIL | 111–119 | 49-103 | 6-43 | 7-9 | 8 | 5 | 108.8 | 116.7 | 102.0 |
| Dec 27 | @DAL | 113–110 | 40-92 | 17-43 | 16-23 | 16 | 18 | 113.0 | 111.1 | 99.5 |
| Dec 23 | @CHI | 109–95 | 39-88 | 12-45 | 19-26 | 12 | 15 | 118.5 | 101.1 | 93.0 |
| Dec 21 | NOP | 104–123 | 41-87 | 17-44 | 5-8 | 11 | 6 | 113.0 | 130.9 | 93.0 |
Off and Def are points scored and allowed per 100 possessions in each game; their averages are the 10-game ratings above. OREB is missing (–) where the source data didn't record it.
The result against the forecast
2023-24 surprise gamesSurprise is measured against this model's forecast, not against what other observers expected. Outcome surprise is −ln(winner's pregame probability): 0.69 for a coin flip, 2.3 for a 10% winner.
Team box score
What happened in the game. These numbers are not used by the forecast, and they are not offered as the reason it missed.
| Team stat | MIL | CLE |
|---|---|---|
| Final score | 95 | 135 |
| Field goals | 38–95 · 40.0% | 55–93 · 59.1% |
| Three-pointers | 12–42 · 28.6% | 12–28 · 42.9% |
| Free throws | 7–10 · 70.0% | 13–19 · 68.4% |
| Rebounds | 36 | 55 |
| Assists | 19 | 36 |
| Turnovers | 10 | 10 |
| Steals | 6 | 5 |
| Blocks | 6 | 3 |
How the model does with these teams over time: Milwaukee Bucks · Cleveland Cavaliers
Where the forecast differed from the result
| Measure | Forecast | Actual | Actual − forecast |
|---|---|---|---|
| Home margin (CLE) | +4 | +40 | +36 |
| Total points | 228 | 230 | +2 |
| MIL points | 112 | 95 | −17 |
| CLE points | 116 | 135 | +19 |
Score by quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | OT | Final |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 22 | 19 | 26 | 28 | – | 95 |
| CLE | 32 | 34 | 42 | 27 | – | 135 |
Recent form before this game
Previous meetings
| Date | Matchup | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 29 2023-24 | MIL at CLE | MIL 119 – 111 CLE |
| Jan 21 2022-23 | MIL at CLE | MIL 102 – 114 CLE |
| Dec 21 2022-23 | MIL at CLE | MIL 106 – 114 CLE |
| Nov 25 2022-23 | CLE at MIL | CLE 102 – 117 MIL |
| Nov 16 2022-23 | CLE at MIL | CLE 98 – 113 MIL |